Musicians have long criticized the streaming service’s paltry payouts, but a new wave of boycotts is emerging

    • gon [he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well, it’s an artist co-op. Artists own part of the platform, so they can control how it works and what decisions are made.

      Instead of being at the whims of some profit-brained tech CEO, the artists vote on what the platform does – it’s a democratic way to control the future of the internet, or, in this particular case, of music streaming, sales, and merch for artists on the internet.

      I think it’s pretty cool, but it’s not a thing quite yet. They’re aiming to open this year, though. We’ll see.

      • dustycups@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The nice thing about this model (band camp, subvert etc) is that they don’t have network effects:
        Just because artists I like are on bandcamp there is no extra ‘cost’ for me to get that one artist from subvert. That means that artists are not locked into the biggest platform.