Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • fullsquare@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    this has been previously sneered on, but only now i’ve clocked this: AI2027 is another name for, or elaboration* of “san francisco consensus”, from april this year or so, “named so because everyone who believes in it is in san francisco”, more precisely timeline roughly matches and it hinges on iterative self-improvement

    * which might just mean it was laundered through chatbots to bulk it up initially. what i mean to say is even openai’s dooming might not be original

    so if anyone’s counting then this thing is a couple of months older