• ideonek@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    On the other hand they inflate the cost, by “renting” equipment to themselves, so who the fuck knows what’s going on… I would be more concerned with the opportunity costs. Breaking even or even a reasonable profit is just not enought for those gluttonous monsters.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It makes some sense for them to rent the equipment to themselves because it effectively adds opportunity cost to the budget. That equipment can’t be used on another film, so it has an opportunity cost to the studio to be used in this one. Are the numbers reasonable though? Idk.

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      As I understand it as a layman:

      1. They put out a cost to profit that says whatever they are trying to say to investors, the market and potential investors.
      2. They use a 2nd, greatly inflated, number when paying the actors and staff so that very few movies have ever made money according to this method.
      • bless@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Famously, fucking The Empire Strikes Back didn’t make any money

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          IIRC, Alien didn’t officially make a profit until a couple of years ago.

          Hollywood accounting is wild.

      • ideonek@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I heard one of many trick they do is creating the shell companies to produce a specific movie. Than that company pay for borrowing equipments, studios, licences etc from parent company… And than its bankruped beecouse the move “didn’t do that well”… All profits ate transfered upfront, while or costs are part of the bankruptcy process.

        • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The oil industry does a similar thing.

          When a well starts approaching end of life, they transfer it to a shell company that only owns the well site and anything they can’t profit from / move elsewhere.

          So when the well dies, they just leave and the shell company goes bankrupt, leaving the polluted well site behind and taxpayers to pick up the tab.