Yes it is, but it’s already covered. I’m memeing on the the text.
It’s like saying “you need less fuel per mile/kilometer and you need less fuel”.
You can’t just say, “you need less fuel”, because it always depends on how much you actually drive and that kind of measure is already the “liters per kilometer”, so the second part of the sentence is just nonsense. Which makes me question if the person writing about it, understood any part of what they’re writing about.
Ah, I see. I couldn’t make sense of the other comments about density, but I get it now.
I think with your analogy, it would be more like you have a vehicle that needs less fuel per distance, but it also magically doesn’t need to travel as much distance to reach your destination.
I don’t understand the confusion. Isn’t lighter material an improvement?
Yes it is, but it’s already covered. I’m memeing on the the text.
It’s like saying “you need less fuel per mile/kilometer and you need less fuel”.
You can’t just say, “you need less fuel”, because it always depends on how much you actually drive and that kind of measure is already the “liters per kilometer”, so the second part of the sentence is just nonsense. Which makes me question if the person writing about it, understood any part of what they’re writing about.
Ah, I see. I couldn’t make sense of the other comments about density, but I get it now.
I think with your analogy, it would be more like you have a vehicle that needs less fuel per distance, but it also magically doesn’t need to travel as much distance to reach your destination.