• kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I both dislike the book and dislike this comic for missing the actual point of the book, which is not in fact, haha, this is what would actually happen and it’s just a group of random kids. It was specifically portraying british aristocratic children to criticize the colonizer mindset while discussing larger issues of human nature and civility and structure vs chaos.

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I haven’t read the book but how did it criticize the colonizer mindset? A cursory look makes it seem like a justification of paternalistic authority, so propaganda for kids to blindly listen to their parents haha.

      If anything wouldn’t this be justification for colonization, as colonized nations were often infantalized/dehumanized?

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It was specifically a contrast on the colonizer mindset that was common both in culture and literature at the time. Showing a bunch of useless british aristocrats coming to “savage lands” and rather than taming the land they were shown that without their wealth and power and being taken care of by competent natives and labourers they became the savages they claimed to be inherently divinely better than.