Archived

Europe, in its trade dealings with China, needs to act “in a more offensive way” to protect its own interests and those of its companies, [Germany’s] Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel said.

[…]

When it comes to China, let me only say one thing: China needs Europe more than Europe needs China," Nagel, who sits on the ECB’s Governing Council, said.

[…]

We are a strong economy. We are four hundred fifty million people… So we should play the European card in a more offensive way."

Nagel said Europe needed to avoid a trade war with China and should maintain a dialogue but also needed to protect its own markets.

“The point that I would like to say here is that Europe should play the cards in a way that we are more convinced about ourselves, because the most important market for the European is Europe itself,” Nagel told a financial event.

[…]

  • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    in what sense is the chinese government a big problem compared to the us with whom we try to keep good relations despite the fact they screw us over geopolitically the 1st chance they get? (they can ground ozr f35’s on a whim, nordstream was a thorn in their eyes, they sanction us for trying to be digitally independet etc.)

    what did china do? sell cheap ev’s that compete with european manufacturers and they took over the lead in solar because european politicians stopped incentivizing innovation. wow.

    • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, the U.S. goes in the wrong direction, straight into a dictatorship. China is already there, though. I agree that Europe must be tougher.

      • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        in what sense is china a dictatorship? their political system completely differs from western democracies. on a communal level it is highly democractic on a communal level and seems to look out for it´s people in general. i am no huge china fan and have my own issues with it but strictly calling it a “dictatorship” and dismissing it as a valuable partner leaves a sour taste in my mouth - something about europeans with their own problems (rise of fascism and going the same path of billionaires dictating policy like the us) thinking they are the only valid democracy.

            • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              it is important we question all “facts” we get presented

              Well, this is so true. Not exclusively, but also for China. Beijing’s mass surveillance of its own citizens (China 1 surveillance camera for every 2 citizens) is a massive problem, as well as the ‘influencers’ covering the genocide in Xinjiang and elsewhere, as you touched it. But there are a lot more reasons. This is why we can easily agree to the linked report, it’s absolutely fair to say that Europe needs to be tougher on China.

                • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  chinas mass surveillance is not even close to what the uk does or what european countries want with palantir and chat control and the so-called ‘genocide’ in xinjiang was only pushed by western far right think tanks.

                  Yeah, this is exactly the point. China’s total control of the web and the society is far ahead with devastating consequences for the Chinese people and their freedom, and Palantir and ‘chat control’ is supposedly a timid step in this direction. But China is, again, far ahead. We see that in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia, for example, where several rights groups, personal witnesses, and international organizations provided ample evidence of China genocidal policies.

                  So, check the ‘facts’ you read! I don’t know where you get your information, but you may search for alternative sources.