• greyhathero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    You cannot and that’s ok. The problem here is people have different levels of risk acceptance and that’s ok. If I was a government or corporate leader I would probably prefer buying direct from apple, but most end consumers, especially those who want to do these repairs should have the choice to accept that risk on a device that they own. The manufacturer shouldn’t decide who I trust. The owner should.

    • kitonthenet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      people have different levels of risk acceptance and that’s ok

      Except it is the editorial agenda of ifixit to promote legislation that requires this lesser level of security, which makes it not ok. Outlawing verification in software requires all devices to have the same vulnerability at the interface, it would even affect users who want to buy OEM.

      • ink@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        requires all devices to have the same vulnerability at the interface

        Tell me you don’t know shit about tech without telling me you don’t know shit about tech.

        But, my god, Steve jobs would laugh at how easy his marketing techniques made dumb people feel smart.

      • Zangoose@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can have both though. Just add some random menu in the settings that turns bright red when using a non-certified component so security can be easily verified, but don’t needlessly lock people out and charge $500 to fix a $10-50 module on a $1000 phone

        Edit: Adding on to this, Ifixit isn’t outlawing verification, the above example of whatever red warning is a clear way they could keep it.