MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agoSignal chat protection against quantum computerssignal.orgexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1260arrow-down18
arrow-up1252arrow-down1external-linkSignal chat protection against quantum computerssignal.orgMazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squaresudo22@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat law is for chat apps that have a user base over like 40M. Is Signal even that large yet?
minus-squareFeyter@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNo and that’s why signal can decide on their own if they want to enable chat with other messager or not. Meta has no choice anymore. Matrix shows me that you can have both secure and decentralized communication.
minus-squareprogandy@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoMatrix does have a lot of unencrypted metadata, though, only the message contents are really private. That is not enough for some people.
That law is for chat apps that have a user base over like 40M. Is Signal even that large yet?
No and that’s why signal can decide on their own if they want to enable chat with other messager or not. Meta has no choice anymore.
Matrix shows me that you can have both secure and decentralized communication.
Matrix does have a lot of unencrypted metadata, though, only the message contents are really private. That is not enough for some people.