• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Well, she would, because she’s a child sexual abuse survivor and it’s a hypersexualization thing and a result of how she’s been told things work by the adults taking advantage of her.

    Still fucked up to type that out and not have some editor say “Are you doing okay, Stevie?”

    And don’t pretend this is only fucked up sexual thing he’s written about children.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is a very well-made point which does make a very good case for her actions fitting with her backstory.

      However, a) it really only works as a post-hoc rationalisation for the scene, rather than an explantation for why the book is better with it, and b) speaking about consistency and foreplanning is somewhat undermined by the climax of the book being “…actually, it’s a…giant alien spider!”

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      You know the story isn’t real, and any “explanation” that makes it seem logical is purely designed by the author, right? She didn’t survive anything. King made up a story about a sexual assault survivor and wrote this into it. He could have chosen literally anything else.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Sure, he was being a weird freak of an author and not for the last time.

        Doesn’t mean it’s not outright silly to complain that a child SA survivor has a broken view of sexual norms and what adulthood is.