I saw that a post was made in !main@sh.itjust.works about defederation about a month ago, an admin commented to make a post here to discuss defederation, but the post was never made.

https://maga.place/ is very obviously a small community with no real substance to it, but I saw an antivax post to !science_memes@mander.xyz and was surprised it still exists.

Anyways I don’t really have a lot to say but uh, I recently hit a full year on this great instance 😊 (old account @TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works)

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I navigated the instance some. The amount of disinformation on its posts is concerning to me. I hadent personally been effected but the potential is worrisome.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As a general rule, I am against defederation unless the instance is going to cause liability or technical problems (bot spamming, illegal content, etc.)

    This instance in particular is closer to banning a user that is self hosting. It is closed, requires account approval, and thusly defederation will not catch any unknowing users in a dragnet.

    So I think defederation is a reasonable exception for this instance, especially given the community vote in progress.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I haven’t seen any evidence of their users consistently violating rules of other instances, I’ve only seen intolerant communities on their instance. That should not be grounds for defederation, we should only defederate if their instance refuses to deal with reported abuse from their users.

    So I’ll vote no on this. While I very much disagree politically w/ that instance, I don’t think that’s enough to defederate.

  • poke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I would like the option to vote to defer to the moderators. Reason being while I think it is valid to keep their community exposed to outside, less supportive, takes on their ideology, I also understand that the community has potential to be a particularly toxic and hostile one, so I understand if our moderators (who I am very appreciative of) don’t want to take on the task of keeping them in check on this community.

    Also, those of you upvoting and downvoting votes are wild.

  • emmy67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    They should be defederated.

    Their hateful ideas should have no place here.

  • Sunoc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    The post on Science Memes got downvoted into oblivion, which is funny.

    But yeah, we should probably defed these pos.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And keep your own echo-chamber? I’m very disappointed in this community… I haven’t come across any posts from that community but their front page looks no worse than news@lemmy.ml just with a different slant. They don’t even have any comments so the community must be tiny.

    • emmy67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is the logic that keeps them and their hateful ideas in the community.

      Let them go live in their own bubble.

      Locking them out of the broader community is the right choice