• Mikelius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I wanted to comment on fire ants for this (which are an invasive one). Anyone who has experienced fire ants would not feel sorry for a genocide on them.

    • wieson@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s impossible for fire ants to be invasive in general.

      They’re invasive to SOMEWHERE. We don’t all live in the same neighbourhood.

      • Mikelius@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The way I understood it, invasive simply meant a species that grows and spreads at an aggressive speed in an ecosystem that it did not originate from. Fire ants very much match this definition as they were introduced outside of south Africa into several ecosystems where they spread at an aggressive rate.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_of_the_World's_Worst_Invasive_Alien_Species has a nice list of examples of species that are simply classified as invasive. Fire ants are on the top 100 list there.

        That being said, while fire ants are not invasive to South Africa technically, this can be said about all species in the world (that they’re not invasive to SOMEWHERE). I didn’t feel the need to say where I was located in my message since it felt redundant, and as the term invasive should be assumed to talk about how whatever it is, is invasive to somewhere else, wherever that is.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Classic US defaultism. They often have problems understanding the concept of the world wide web.