• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Nothing in this context, but it can have a lot to do with force, for which pounds is the US customary unit.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      when compared to a value in Kg, the only logical interpretation is the mass pound. If it were lbf, the si unit conversion would be Newtons.

      Having the same name for two different, but easily mixed up units is really annoying haha

    • madjo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s clear from context clues that they don’t mean Force. As kilograms are an indicator of mass, not force. It’s not our fault that US’ imperial system is silly.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Imperial is a British thing, and the quantities differ significantly from US customary.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Nope. As I said, the US customarily uses US customary units. They ARE NOT identical to “Imperial” units, despite the coincidental naming.