“It’s safe to say that the people who volunteered to “shape” the initiative want it dead and buried. Of the 52 responses at the time of writing, all rejected the idea and asked Mozilla to stop shoving AI features into Firefox.”

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    A fork is great, but the more a fork deviates, the more issues there are likely to be. Firefox is already at low enough numbers that it’s not really sustainable.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My two biggest issues with a fork are: a) timely updates, they take a bit longer than the main version, and b) trust issues, I don’t trust most forks.

    • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Then Mozilla should start listening to their users instead of driving them away. I know I stopped using Firefox after being a regular user since launch because the AI nonsense became the last sta straw.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Then Mozilla should start listening to their users instead of driving them away.

        I think the hope is to get more people in than losing them. But with Ai nobody will stay forever, because the time someone else makes a better Ai tool, they switch. Because Mozilla loses personality and uniqueness and start getting replaceable. … just like employees who are forced to use Ai instead their own work and knowledge.