• dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Malicious compliance writ large.

    Also, the number of hurdles you have to clear for this tells volumes about where the site owner priorities lie.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Hence why the EU is now forcing an “easy way to decline”. All compliant websites have a “reject all cookies” button now.

      Which I learned on accident, because normally I have Ghostery installed, which just rejects all cookies automatically.

      • That Weird Vegan she/her@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There was some controversy around Ghostery. A number of years ago, I believe they were allowing anyone who paid them money to not be blocked. They have since reversed track, but I won’t ever use their plugin again.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I believe they were allowing anyone who paid them money to not be blocked.

          Hmmm… Must’ve been a long while ago. I’ve been using them for… 3? 4? years and never had any ads getting through.

      • matti@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure that was the law from day 1 and the only difference is they’re starting to crack down on it now