• Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’ve seen the idea floated that we jack up property taxes, exempting owner-occupied homes. I don’t think it’s that bad for seniors to downsize and increase housing liquidity and let people who want to get more out of local communities for their tax burden. We’re facing a lot of resistance to taxes and our schools are getting disrupted by budget shortfalls. I’m happy to pay more because I have kids who use the parks, sidewalks, schools, library, etc. a lot of seniors use less and don’t want to pay more. So maybe low-but-nonzero property tax for owner-occupied, and high tax for landlords like me!

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      exempting owner-occupied homes

      It would still suck for anyone stuck with renting. It would disincentivize renting, but still, would suck short term.

      • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s true that some landlords would jack up rent rather than sell - especially as some people are stuck renting in a tighter market. Ideally you could separate corporate landlords from onesie-twosie landlords? A big issue is that landlords and banks are happy to artificially tighten the market with vacant housing. I think Vancouver Canada had a law that levied taxes on unoccupied housing - I should look into how that went