nehare@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoEminem sues Australian beach brand 'Swim Shady'www.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1161arrow-down15
arrow-up1156arrow-down1external-linkEminem sues Australian beach brand 'Swim Shady'www.bbc.comnehare@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareA_norny_mousse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down4·2 days agoMoney running out, or did you sell your soul to Big Music, who are doing this on your behalf?
minus-squarekata1yst@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down4·2 days agoIf you don’t enforce your trademarks, you lose them. Unless Marshall is giving up on his legal ownership of “Slim Shady” he legally must do something.
minus-squareØπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·2 days agoFalse. Stop regurging the bullshit.
minus-squarekata1yst@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoThis is such a easily discounted, lazy take I’m going to assume you’re just trolling. But just in case: https://aaronhall.com/the-use-it-or-lose-it-doctrine-in-trademarks/ https://generisonline.com/understanding-the-implications-of-the-united-states-use-it-or-lose-it-principle-in-trademark-law/ https://www.morse.law/news/trademarks-use-them-properly-or-lose-them/ https://thetrademarkfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Ziebarth-v-Del-Taco-LLC-TTAB-Cancellation-920535011.pdf And for further context, not the first time he’s had to defend it. https://marksgray.com/intellectual-property-law/the-real-slim-shady-trademark/
minus-squareBakerBagel@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoPoor guy probably lost big on Bored Ape Yacht Club
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoJeebus what a fever dream that debacle was! Like the entire thing about currency is that it is fungible. I didn’t go to Taco Bell and expect them to keep the change!
Money running out, or did you sell your soul to Big Music, who are doing this on your behalf?
If you don’t enforce your trademarks, you lose them. Unless Marshall is giving up on his legal ownership of “Slim Shady” he legally must do something.
False. Stop regurging the bullshit.
This is such a easily discounted, lazy take I’m going to assume you’re just trolling. But just in case:
https://aaronhall.com/the-use-it-or-lose-it-doctrine-in-trademarks/
https://generisonline.com/understanding-the-implications-of-the-united-states-use-it-or-lose-it-principle-in-trademark-law/
https://www.morse.law/news/trademarks-use-them-properly-or-lose-them/
https://thetrademarkfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Ziebarth-v-Del-Taco-LLC-TTAB-Cancellation-920535011.pdf
And for further context, not the first time he’s had to defend it. https://marksgray.com/intellectual-property-law/the-real-slim-shady-trademark/
Poor guy probably lost big on Bored Ape Yacht Club
Jeebus what a fever dream that debacle was! Like the entire thing about currency is that it is fungible. I didn’t go to Taco Bell and expect them to keep the change!