• lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        hah.

        personally i think a big part of the problem is that real-name identification for things that shouldn’t need it is just sort of accepted, rather than being criticised as the massive invasion of privacy that it is. whether it includes children or not is a side note in my mind.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            well, we’re here. but the companies and governments pushing this are already looking at possible next steps, like building systems where your real identity is used everywhere.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                maybe. when china did it with their law about children not using their phones after curfew, they handled it by building a face database of everyone except children, then matching against that.

                  • lime!@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    also a very useful way to mask your true reason if your true reason is “i want to build a database of people”. four horsemen of the internet type shit.