Kyiv has been offered a “Kremlin peace plan” under the guise of negotiations. The US and Russia have reportedly prepared a peace plan for Ukraine that would involve Kyiv meeting the Kremlin’s maximalist demands, says Christopher Miller, a correspondent for the Financial Times.

At the same time, Reuters sources report that the US indicated to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Kyiv should accept Washington-prepared frameworks for ending the war with Russia. It remains unclear what security guarantees would be given for Kyiv, as there is no evidence that the Kremlin has abandoned its imperial ambitions.

Earlier, Axios wrote that Washington and Moscow were discussing a new peace plan to end Russia’s war against Ukraine.

  • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yes and yes (although I haven’t encouraged anyone).

    It’s funny how you all always scream for people dying on Ukraine’s side, but don’t even mention that on the other side the situation is even worse since no one there is fighting for their home or to protect their families and loved ones.

    Makes me wonder if you are just ignorant, brainwashed or acting in bad faith.

    Are you telling me that if your county was invaded you would just roll over and hope to not get hurt?

      • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sadly what i said isn’t “Ukrainians have to fight” in my first comment.

        I said the EU should go to war.

              • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I see, so when you are blatantly wrong we stop arguing. Got it.

                Then what is your point about the EU? Read again my first comment and tell me how is it relevant in any way.

                Ending hunger, war, poverty, diseases etc… are all extremely unlikely too, yet I see no reason I shouldn’t prefer it to what we have today.

                  • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    I for one prefer full scale war than this.

                    There is no mention of Ukrainians, let alone any “encouragement” to do anything.

                    The article itself doesn’t mention Ukrainians, but third parties pushing for a “peace” that is actually full submission to Russia.

                    I state, as a European, that I would prefer the risk of having my own country and the whole EU in the war, than forcing Ukraine to surrender to its invader.

                    These are my words explained as clearly as I can, so you can understand them better and stop twisting them more than you already did.

                    And to your false and hypocritical care about the lost lives, present and future, of the people of Ukraine I answer with a word and a quote:

                    Crimea.

                    Insanity is repeating the same mistakes over and over again and expecting different results.

                    Now that you have been proven blatantly wrong I guess that the discussion is over.