• ddplf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Which is the worst of two worlds, because now most people will still not be able to verify other account’s credibility, however people with bad intentions - who are usually more prepared - will still be able to continue their activities.

    Now imagine you’re a fragile person who’s really paranoid about their internet activity. This is obviously a good change for them, so they click it. One day, someone decides to use this backdoor to bully that person by insulting them under multiple posts and comments that were meant not to be traceable. I can only imagine the consequences.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If you want to be anonymous on the internet you can’t rely on some website to protect you.I get your point but people need to really start learning the reality of the internet again.

      • ddplf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        This is an example of social darwinism. That doesn’t mean I don’t agree with this idea, it’s just that I don’t agree that it is viable to expect it from everyone.

        Companies must be forced to care about peoples’ security and privacy. Actively fighting against bots infestation would be a part of that.