Everyone knows the tale of Brand X getting bought out by some faceless global conglomerate and going to shit, but does the opposite ever happen?

  • Ringo13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I definitely think the original post meant things like retail stores, social media platforms, nationwide chain restaurants, etc

    • oo1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the term the OP used was “faceless conglomorate”.

      I heard Matt Stone’s face was ripped off by Scuzzlebutt, and Trey Parker was conglomerated into a dawson’s creek trapper keeper, so seems like a fair answer to me.

    • harmonea@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sure, but that was just additional context for my question, which was what this poster feels is the difference between changing owners and buying out a company.

      • Ringo13@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re thinking of changing owners vs buying a corporate company with a CEO. Yeah they’re similar lol but not really what the post is asking for on here