Everyone knows the tale of Brand X getting bought out by some faceless global conglomerate and going to shit, but does the opposite ever happen?

  • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even before that, Apple owes its very existence to an acquisition. Acquiring Next allowed them to abandon their dying OS and start anew with OS X, and brought back in founder Steve Jobs (who Apple had previously fired). With Steve Jobs at the helm, they made the computers cool again to buy some time before the iPod completely turned the company around.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was almost like NeXT was acquiring Apple for their branding, with the way it turned out.

      • AragornK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A similar thing happened with Pixar/Disney, where post acquisition Disney Animation Studios started to work a lot more like Pixar. Interestingly, Steve Jobs was also CEO and majority shareholder at Pixar up until that acquisition.

        • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bet with AppleTV+ Apple is wishing Jobs integrated Pixar into Apple instead of selling to Disney.

          • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, that would’ve spread the company too thin. Apple needed that laser-focus approach they had in the iPhone days, else they’d be dead.

      • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        An incredibly rare example of ‘I won’t buy it unless you pay me to’ actually working out in real life.