Re-posted since LW removed it…

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.org/post/2610169

Jared Birchall is Elon Musk’s right hand man. He controls Elon Musk’s family foundation and is in charge of hiring bodyguards to protect Elon. He is one of the very few people that Elon Musk trusts.

With his wife Laura, he lives in Austin, Texas.

According to public documents, they are located at 16715, Destiny Cove, Austin, TX 78738-7421.

[Original image of family removed]

Donald Trump falsely said migrant families living in Springfield, Ohio, were stealing pets and eating cats and dogs.

Elon Musk amplified these lies on X.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/media/elon-musk-trump-rally-bomb-election-misinformation

As a result, these families received thousands death threats.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/19/nx-s1-5114047/springfield-ohio-haitian-migrants-trump-safety-concerns

Jared Birchall laughed about it. He absolutely loved it. His lovely wife Laura Birchall thought this was very funny.

Jared is obsessed about his privacy. He doesn’t want anyone to know who he is.

“Why are you posting their picture?”

Free speech absolutism baby.

I don’t owe them shit.

  • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Posting a person’s address, picture, full name, and a list of personal faults that is supported by evidence which would likely cause people to reach out and contact the person over their actions.

    Doxxing is “posting private or identifying information about an individual without the person’s consent, usually with malicious intent”.

    So yeah, without the intent but it could be considered doxxing.

    Unless you have some actual evidence or a counter argument to make instead of “nuh uh”?

    • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just think it’s important for folks to know they have a fascist living in their community, similar to how a pedophile register works. For the record, I don’t wish any physical harm to come to him. I just think its important to expose and keep an eye on fascists who do wish harm on whole swathes of society. Much as fascists don’t give a damn about the privacy of regular citizens who might oppose their plans (e.g. ICE using Flock cameras for domestic surveillance, or basically anything the NSA does), I don’t see why rich fascists should get special consideration wrt their privacy, especially when it comes to publicly available info like court records.

      • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh I don’t disagree, I just didn’t want you to get deleted over doxxing. That’s why I made the comment, and if you notice in no part was it against the action or critical of being open about these shits who abuse our systems.

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Only that you’re a pedophile terrorist who’s here illegally, and therefore I needn’t justify anything.

      I don’t know where you are, and I’m only like 90% sure where I am right now, but you totally are.

        • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was a satirical take on what people like Trump and Birchall freely accuse “illegal” immigrants of being/doing, to justify their imprisonment and deportation.

              • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Oh OK, how do you know they were sarcastic since it’s currently 1-1 on how it was interpreted?

                Or is that just a justification because they’re emphatically supporting you?

                Edit: seems like it’s 2-3 in my favor so maybe more people need that than you think?

          • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s a personal attack that was unwarranted and which should be deleted and banned if the community rules were being followed.

            It in no way feels satirical considering that there was no provocation for it aside from me responding with evidence as to why it might appear as doxxing.

            Y’all could have just said “and we’re ok with that considering they use those strategies regularly” since that would be justification and not a personal attack.