Italy’s parliament has approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

Italy’s parliament on Tuesday approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

The vote coincided with the international day for the elimination of violence against women, a day designated by the U.N. General Assembly.

The law won bipartisan support from the center-right majority and the center-left opposition in the final vote in the Lower Chamber, passing with 237 votes in favor.

The law, backed by the conservative government of Premier Giorgia Meloni, comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy. It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn.

  • DishonestBirb@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3821·
    9 hours ago

    This is confusing. So killing a woman is now criminally worse than killing a man? That seems absurd.

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.worldEnglish
      365·
      9 hours ago

      “Hate crime” exists in the US with pretty much the same logic.

      The law… comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy.

      “Targeting” being the keyword here

      • falseWhite@lemmy.worldEnglish
        810·
        9 hours ago

        How does one determine if the killer killed the woman because he hated her and not just for fun?

        I’d guess most murders happen because somebody really hated that person. So that’s kinda stupid. But maybe I’m missing something.

        Also, I’d think most murders are targeted, otherwise it’s just manslaughter, no?

        • pageflight@lemmy.worldEnglish
          203·
          9 hours ago

          There’s a lot of distinction around intent in US law: premeditated, 1st degree, manslaughter (as you brought up) v homicide.

          And laws are often written in blood: if something is happening enough people want to curtail it, make more law/punishment. So this just recognizes that femicide has been a particular problem.

          Is a woman losing her life worse than a man? Not inherently. Does Italy need a more severe deterrent for targeting women lethally than other cases? Sounds like.

          • falseWhite@lemmy.worldEnglish
            92·
            8 hours ago

            I’m familiar with mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

            Is that what this is? The article is not very clear on this and it sounds like regardless of the circumstances, any murder of a woman will be treated as a femicide.

            Edit: okay I found another article that does mention aggravating circumstances, like stalking and sexual violence. Which makes a lot more sense.

        • tired_n_bored@lemmy.worldEnglish
          17·
          8 hours ago

          Italian here: the crime arises when the homicide is committed because the woman refused to start or pursue a relationship with the perpetrator.

          • falseWhite@lemmy.worldEnglish
            81·
            8 hours ago

            Just a poorly written article, omitting many key points about this and it’s causing confusion for those that haven’t been following this saga, which I guess is most non-Italians

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.worldEnglish
          32·
          5 hours ago

          How does one determine if the killer killed the woman because he hated her and not just for fun?

          What have you read on the legal basis of hate crime laws? What have you done yourself in order to answer your own questions?

        • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          3·
          8 hours ago

          Usually because of statements made by the perpetrator, either before or after the attack, that show they targeted this person for that reason.

    • nomad@infosec.pubEnglish
      47·
      7 hours ago

      Confusing? Its impossible to know. How would you determine the gender of a dead person without assuming their gender?! That’s the only thing worse than murder and we shouldn’tallows that no matter how much more the man has to suffer in three eyes of the law. At least we don’t just assume his gender.