szmer
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 15 hours ago

Anon thinks we're being bamboo-zled

sh.itjust.works

external-link
message-square
30
fedilink
264
external-link

Anon thinks we're being bamboo-zled

sh.itjust.works

🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 15 hours ago
message-square
30
fedilink
  • finitebanjo@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The wikipedia contributors were unable to link to a digitization of the book, that’s what I mean by improper. I don’t own a copy of books written in 223 AD, neither does my local library.

    The Donald Harper book you just posted was published in 2012. 2012 came later than the 18th century.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      That’s not how citations work.

      You’ll notice under the “General References” section the full citation of the work.

      Because the work is cited multiple times, it is appropriate to use a shortened citation, following the proper style according to the wikipedia guidelines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Shortened_footnotes

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Say your library did, you would read this book in Classical Chinese? Or would you rely on a translation, probably published much later?

      • finitebanjo@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It being listed in the catalog would at least be some indication that the evidence exists, as opposed to an endless linked list of “trust me bro”.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Here’s a digitization of the first one and the second one, including a picture of an edition of the work itself. I found it by googling the names of the works in the quoted section.

          If that’s not sufficient, I suggest you ask at your local (or most local) university library.

          • sniggleboots@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 hours ago

            you are doing god’s work with the patience of a saint

    • mech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m following this exchange with steadily increasing fascination, still on the fence on whether Pandas exist.

      • Icytrees@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I found a lead. Could help explain why pandas got so famous in China so recently. Taipei Times isn’t a great source but it’s late and I got excited. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2009/02/08/2003435562

        And this: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2151717-the-first-ancestors-of-giant-pandas-probably-lived-in-europe/

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Here’s a link to the Erya.

Greentext@sh.itjust.works

greentext@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !greentext@sh.itjust.works

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 557 users / day
  • 2.22K users / week
  • 4.56K users / month
  • 14K users / 6 months
  • 11 local subscribers
  • 7.39K subscribers
  • 1.61K Posts
  • 45.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • 🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.works
  • BE: 0.19.6
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org