• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s an argument to be made that flights less than, say, 4 hrs should be taxed more, as a train can easily and more efficiently handle that trip. What with the pre-checkin time, it gives a good 2-3 hrs buffer for transfers. Flying from London to Amsterdam is just silly.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Also, a flight emits more emissions when ascending and descending than at cruising altitude, meaning that short-haul flights emit more per mile than longer ones. And a financial penalty on flying will act best as a deterrent where there are alternatives: one could conceivably replace a flight from Amsterdam to Berlin or Barcelona with a day-long and/or overnight train journey (especially if rail travel was cheaper), though there are few alternatives to flying to New York or Singapore other than not going. (If flights weren’t an option, a trans-Atlantic crossing would take most of a week and a sea journey to East Asia about a month. A train via the Trans-Siberian Railway, were it geopolitically viable, takes a week to go between Moscow and Vladivostok or Beijing.)

    • bryndos@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Eurostar has annoying pre-checkin times too though at least for London - they recommend over an hour.

      I think that does make it faster to fly even with 2*airport to centre transit times - though extra time for checked bag in an airplane might just swing it back the other way.

      If you could turn up for eurostar 5 minutes before, like a normal train it’d probably be better.

      • qevlarr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Those pre-checkin times are needed because the queues are insane. There should be much higher capacity at rush hour