• FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The article is about how they don’t work. It’s why we are talking about it. Anyway, you decided insults were the way to go so I’m out after the first sentence.

    • Devial@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No it isn’t. The article is about how they RARELY work, and you’d be rarely in a situation where you can effectively use them. Sarcastically calling someone genius after they’ve repeated the same, wrong, point for the 3rd time in a row isn’t an insult dude, that’s ridicolous.

      Please quote the exact part of the article which states these tools will literally NEVER work, in any possible situation. Because that’s what you’ve repeatedly claimed, and I’ve repeatedly repudiated. So since I apparently missed that part of the article, do please quote it to me so I can verify.

      Anyway, you decided insults were the way to go so I’m out after the first sentence.

      You could just admit that you’re unable to answer my hypothetical without destroying your own point. Or do this. Also fine.