cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327

In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.

The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.

It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance

Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.

You can see for yourself here

Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon

  • stratoscaster@lemmy.zipEnglish
    964·
    1 year ago

    It’s not real, it was a joke made by 4chan that stuck. Nobody is actually using that term unless they’re a pedophile

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      126·
      1 year ago

      There are actual retards out in the wild that use the term to describe pedophiles unironically. No one likes them. Bully them.

    • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      52·
      1 year ago

      The term is real, it’s even used in scientific literature. The term possibly even predates 4chan, or maybe it’s just a success on 4chan’s part, successfully laundering a term into scientific discourse? It’s hard to find too much solid evidence on the origin of the term. 4chan did seriously signal boost it with the whole “MAP Pride” thing though.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldEnglish
          812·
          1 year ago

          Anti-unnecessary terms. Changing “child porn” (or CP) to “CSAM” is a ridiculous, confusing, and unnecessary thing. And it takes effort away from meaningful action.

          • shagie@programming.devEnglish
            121·
            1 year ago

            https://www.rainn.org/news/what-child-sexual-abuse-material-csam

            While the term child pornography is still widely used by the public, it’s more accurate to call it what it is: evidence of child sexual abuse. That’s why RAINN and others have stopped using the term child pornography and switched to referring to it as CSAM — child sexual abuse materials.

            While some of the pornography online depicts adults who have consented to be filmed, that’s never the case when the images depict children. Just as kids can’t legally consent to sex, they can’t consent to having images of their abuse recorded and distributed. Every explicit photo or video of a kid is actually evidence that the child has been a victim of sexual abuse.

          • Solar Bear@slrpnk.netEnglish
            22·
            1 year ago

            Making of a big deal about it is what takes away effort from meaningful action. Nobody is taking time out of their day over this issue but you. This is silly.