• downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Restaurant Brands International owns Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeye’s Chicken, and Firehouse Subs

    Fuck RBI, they are lying war profiteers putting tax revenue in the hand of the Kremlin which it uses to fund it’s war of genocide in Ukraine. Do not eat in any of their restaurants

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially with firehouse subs having such a purpose washed image/mission, you think they’d be smarter.

    • calzone_gigante@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      War profiteer is an interesting way to look at it. If a company doesn’t cut ties with warmonger countries, they are war profiteers ?

      They should also get away from US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and most of the “developed” countries that are historically exploiting poor countries ?

      They sell fucking burguers, if they manage to not put too much garbage in the food to save money, they are doing enough.

    • Ooops@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you also telling us how much they own of those Burger King franchises in Russia they are supposed to shut down?

      • Tarte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You don’t own franchise partners by definition. They are individually owned restaurants that pay you a fee to use your brand (name, menu, marketing, etc.).

        „Shutting down“ here means: Don’t renew these franchise contracts. The restaurants will continue to exist, but they will have to rebrand and be less lucrative.

        • CobraChicken@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          but they will have to rebrand and be less lucrative.

          And what do you do if those Russian franchise owners refuse to rebrand and continue using the BK name, supplies and signage?

          Do you stop providing logistical support? Do you cut them off the BK supply chain (shut that down too) and not provide any new menu items / marketing materials?

          Has BK done that?

          • Airazz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, obviously you should cut supply lines, duh. Why would you supply products to someone who isn’t paying for them.

            • CobraChicken@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So what is burger king doing wrong here?"

              Edit: At least 10 people didn’t read the fucking article, BK did cut the supply line. This place is just like Reddit, all hurr durr without reading the article.

              • TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                23
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They are telling you, literally. They should revoke the branding licence, cut every supply lines, and sue them if they continue using the brand (as they would surely do if I just started to have a Burger King without a licence). They don’t do these things. Which is wrong. And that’s what they are doing wrong.

                • CobraChicken@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is how I know you didn’t read the article.

                  BK did cut the supply chain logistics. It’s mentioned in the article.

                  Sue the franchisees? Where? In Russia? In the middle of an economic war with the west? Even if the suit proceeded for some reason, who do you expect the court to rule in favor of?

                  BK did everything to severe ties. The only thing that remains is to sell their share of the franchise. If they sell now (even if they find a buyer), they likely won’t be paid in anything other than rubles which is useless.

                • Ooops@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  What imaginary supply line are you talking about? Do you think that any food there is not supplied locally? That they import paper wrappings with a logo from the US? Actually the ones probably importing their stuff are sitting in the US, even if it’s just plastic trash from China.

                  It’s a name. And if they got told not to use it anymore or they just don’t pay anything anymore… what is supposed to happen? Someone goes to Russia and sues them there?

              • Ooops@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nothing, because you just hallucinate supply lines. The franchise pays for the fucking name and that’s it. And if they are not allowed to do so anymore, who’s going to Russia and sue the owning oligarchs there?

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    They outrage is such a great example of western exceptionalism. The existence of western consumer businesses in the countries of the non-Aryan jungle is supposed to be an immense benefit to these places and their departure must necessarily be disastrous for them. Nowhere is the idea entertained that Russians are perfectly capable of creating their own shitty burger restaurants to replace those if the west.

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like that 80s news footage of the first McDonald’s opening in Moscow where they’re like so-true ”finally those filthy commies get to enjoy our superior Western treats”

      Then they interview someone who says it wasn’t really worth it to stand in line and pay so much lenin-laugh

        • Jack.@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is unironically funny as hell. Great copypasta, I’ll add it to my collection.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, if you need to compare a diplomat to a homeless person, then that is a pretty big self own.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Give me a break. No system is perfect and the discussion isn’t about perfection vs horror. It’s about a series of tradeoffs and the tradeoffs done in the west broadly resulting in better outcomes, on average, for the population there than they did in the Soviet Union. For China nowadays, I’m less certain. Definitely in the big Tier 1 cities, life is on par with Western outcomes, for some better for some worse.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m just saying, it’s ironic to use that example of a diplomat as opposed to how many people live paycheck to paycheck barely able to make ends meet or are actually homeless, I doubt those people are crying in joy when they walk into a Walmart

              • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think you’ve missed my point entirely - that could be my fault.

                The example illustrates that even for those well-connected enough in the Soviet Union the sight of a western supermarket was enough to make them weep (this was ‘88).

                I brought this example up to address the false belief that people in Russia weren’t all that impressed with western products (like McDonalds) back when the Soviet Union existed.

                I don’t know how you’re managing to connect that with how people live today and their experience of walking into Walmart.

                Finally, this didn’t take place in Harrods but in ICA in Sweden. Hardly a luxury shop - just an average supermarket.

                • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The idea of communism (extremely simplified) everyone has the means to live and people at “the top” don’t get special privilege on that, obviously almost all actual implementations turn into dictatorships so the point is somewhat moot, however the fact a well connected diplomat in a communist country had to live in the same conditions as other non-well connected people would be a positive, not a negative, they’d see and hopefully be able to improve the lives of everyone as they understand what it’s like.

                  Compare that to a majority of the rich and powerful in America, they’re so ridiculously disconnected from the average experience that they literally do not understand at all what it’s like for those with less.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, there’s no use sitting here arguing about this, is there. I know the truth hurts, so it’s easy to reject.

            • zinguszna@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              What sort of nonsense response is that? Anyone can poop out any anecdote they like to support their position and say “I know it hurts so it’s easy to reject”.

        • mojave102@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And that Soviet lady’s name? Albert Einstein!

          Liberal theory is just bullshit anecdotes on top of bullshit anecdotes.

    • Maestro@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re missing the point. For BK to operate in Russia means dollars flowing into Russia, because BK needs to buy Rubles. Dollars that Russia needs to buy arms on the international market, because nobody is accepting Rubles.

      • hackris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true. However, if I owned BK, I’d see this as an amazing business strategy, although a quite unethical one (but as we can see, multi million+ dollar companies aren’t the most ethical either way). I mean, now the literal government has an interest for it to stay in business, they may even start to promote the brand.

      • zinguszna@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except BK is an American company. They wouldn’t operate in Russia if they weren’t making a profit. So their net effect is to have money flowing out of Russia.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      hexbear
      unironically saying Russia is the victim of imperialism

      Yeah that checks out.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean he’s not wrong, out of all the things to try and start an outrage about, this is just dumb.

        • lingh0e@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They ARE wrong though. They’re acting like we’re only getting mad about one thing at a time. What kind of smug asshole goes on the internet to peddle moral superiority over strawmen?

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s moreso that the emphasis on issues is very often skewed by MSM to the stuff that matters a lot less, and then the normies all get in an outrage. Does it really matter if BK is still in Russia? They’re not actively working with the Russian military right? The money is flowing out to the glorious USA BK hq no?

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There has been a lot of debate on this. Is it cruel and unusaul punishments. Have the russiand done things so bad to deserve burger king. only time will tell.

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who the fuck cares who is still open in Russia. Theres plenty of companiess still open in Israel where’s the outrage over that?

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Putin isn’t chowing down on BK, neither are the oligarchs, or the heads of the army, the FSB, or so on.

    What’s the point of making sure BK leaves the market except and ineffectual attempt to hurt ordinary Russians?

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember when the sanctions started and Western fast food, media, and social media were all pulling out. Someome quipped “oh no, Russians will be the healthiest and happiest people on the planet. How awful.”

      • AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t even understand how the hell burger King is alive to this day. There’s 2 burger kings in my city, both on the same road and I’ve never seen anyone in line at either of them.

        Like are we even sure burger King isint some psy op or something? Does anyone even remember the last time they were in one?

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      also if they left then the burger kings in russia would just stay open. It is not a complicated business to copy when you already have the equipment and staff. It’s as simple as continuing to sell burgers

      Burger king could end it’s francisee relationships but the burger shop is already in russia

    • hackris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the narrative these people are trying to push is that these companies get dollars flowing into Russia, they buy roubles, and Russia uses the dollars on the international weaponry market. I don’t get why this would be a problem, since Microsoft still does the same shit I assume (most Russians definitely use Windows)

    • PR_freak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The main purpose is to create a sentiment of dissatisfaction for the current government

      Edit: I am just pointing out their purpose, it doesn’t mean that I share their view boyz

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it effective? Especially since McD’s leaving the country has just resulted in the Russian suppliers and restaurant owners running the place on their own with the same recipes.

        Are the Russian people going to be angry at the lack of clown/king related branding?

        • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are the Russian people going to be angry at the lack of clown/king related branding?

          I point to things like Aunt Jemima or something and tell you I can see how this might seem like it works to the US

          • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            that’s because Americans just want to be angry at each other about something. Ultimately the American obsession with culture war stupid bullshit comes from the fact that the American constitution is an objectively stupid foundation for a country and its checks and balances prevent any actual politics from getting done so to differentiate themselves politicians have to focus on nonsense

            this has also effected other countries that have too much american news

            I don’t really know a way forward other than just getting rid of the United states as a legal framework and starting a new country entirely from scratch there is really nothing salvageable about the way american democracy is structured and it needs a redesign from the ground up

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Without American fast food, Russians will have to resort to eating rotten maggot-infested meat. It will be like a million Battleship Potemkins all at once.

      • frippa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        IDK I would be pretty happy if shitty body-ruining fast food and proprietary Spyware like Microsoft left my country, I would like my shitty neofascist government sliiiightly more (I am Italian, sadly) if instead of sucking on uncle Sam’s hairy balls they would kick harmful corpos out

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, it’s about economics, not hurting ordinary russians. Doing business in russia gives them money, which helps them pay for the war. It’s as simple as that.

      • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is about economics. If Burger King leaves Russia, they’re still leaving the restaurants, distribution networks and the employees behind. They’re not going to sit idle just because the brand left, rather they’re going to keep going under a new name, just like how McDonald’s did.

        What effect does that have on the Russian war effort? None.

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But Burger King sells to Russians and repatriates some of its profits back to the US. If BK leaves Russia then Russians will spend their money on other restaurants, presumably ones which do not send profits overseas (due to the sanctions) which paradoxically means more money staying in Russia.

        If the restaurants close then there will be some momentary unemployment but there’s a war going on so unemployment helps smooth over manpower issues. That’s also ignoring the possibility of a Russian entity stepping into BK’s shoes like they did with McD’s and just running the place without the trademarks.

        I don’t see any purpose beyond moral posturing.

        • jackmarxist [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t even have to respect trademarks anymore because of how much Russia is sanctioned. They can just keep running their own Burger King with the only difference being that the real BK won’t see any profits and the money will stay inside Russia.

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      when mcdonalds pulled out they just didn’t close the mcdonalds. The buildings and people who work in the mcdonalds were already in Russia there is literally no reason they can’t just stay open

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Renamed to McBlyat, serving Big Pickle with Coca Vodka now.

        I am almost aure they just nationalized the building and it keeps operating, although with a different menu as McDonald’s no longer imports the ingredients. At least they don’t make money out of it.

        • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I go to my local McD’s anything I buy there will be made right here in Norway, and I assume it’s the same in Russia and basically any other country they’re in.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t like it, don’t go there. Tell them why.

    Personally I’m boycotting them. Not because of any moral justification, but because they sell overpriced disappointing mulch.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally worst fast food joint and the only people I’ve met who claim otherwise have objectively bad taste.

      Like no joke, objectively, “I love a butter and cheese sandwich on wonderbread”, British, wouldn’t know flavor if it ripped their tongue out.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have to make my own burgers now. Most places serve fast food swill, and the only nice place has switched to brioche buns.

        Brioche buns are not load bearing buns! They fall apart at the slightest contact with moisture. I will die on this hill forever.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Surely most untoasted buns will fall apart if dealing with anything outside of a basic burger?

          If you use a small, cheap bun, you can’t expect toppings to not break it apart.

          • Espi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            As opposed to dying in a valley forever, totally painless.

            I’m curious about dying on a hill temporarily though.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You rank BK as worse than McDonald’s? I only ask cause I’ve worked at both, and I would put McDonald’s just the tiniest bit lower than BK. Wendy’s is barely better than both BK and McDonald’s.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Back when i used to have fast food, I liked BK over McD because i preferred their fries and i liked their jalapeño poppers.

              • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                McD fries are too soft and when they get cold they are absolute garbage. They almost seem soggy, without getting wet. BK have a crunch to them. At least this is the case in the UK.

              • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not going to say they’re good, but it is wild as fuck how much of a difference franchises can make. There are several BKs in my city, but a select few are owned by a different franchise than the majority of the others. Their food is WAY better, consistently, than the others, and it’s usually a lot fresher tasting.

      • Stabbitha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I sent my sister a bottle of fry sauce that she’s been trying to find for years (she never thought to check Amazon lol), this is what she sends me back. Told her she was supposed to use it to enhance good food, not make terrible food tolerable. not Mmmm

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every hexbear comment reads like AI trained only on the Tumblr accounts of 14 year old boys with Stalin body pillows.