This is exactly what liberals wanted when they passed the earliest hate speech legislation in the 90’s.
Truly a leopards eating my face moment.

If the offenses are note-worthy, they should be in jail. If not then no-one needs to be aware of them.

On the one hand this is how it’s supposed to work.

Why? You think it’s ideal that your livelihood is dependent on holding whatever the majority opinion of the day is?

Conservatives named it, and are currently weaponizing it. But it started with people being racist on facebook and then getting fired because online activists were complaining. This trend continues today with tik-toks that say thing like “make them famous.” The online rallying cry on reddit and other spaces that freedom of speech wasn’t freedom of consequences, and of course that the first amendment only applies to the government.

While those positions are legally true, in liberal fashion they never considered if the chilling effect this created could ever be weaponized. But maybe having your livelihood being dependent on having “correct” opinions could possibly be a problem that a Just society should attempt to address?

It’s real and always has been, the thing liberals are upset about is that it doesn’t just apply to people who say naughty words.

I mean I was happy about that too. Shitty people deserve the consequences of the degrading society they help create and profit off of maintaining.

Being “against political violence” is defending the status quo. Kirk’s opinion on guns wasn’t problematic at all and fucking liberals acting like that was his problem disgust me.

Why? Who cares about “offenses” of a random traveler. Why do you trust an international crime db to be accurate?

What a terribly naive thing to say.

Sounds like this group is more of a social media vibe group, rather then a group interested in real undermining of Zionism. Maybe stop being pawns for slacktivists with rich parents and try joining the PLO instead?

So because some people can’t use no one should use it? I don’t understand the complaint. Is the hot new 1-man privacy focused app that requires side-loading more accessible?

“Millions” of votes means that at the local level the Capitalist party become the third-party.

I’m pretty happy with the outcome. The more America is weakened, the better for the rest of the world and the easier it will be to rebuild to something better.

I’m using “open source” colloquially. The point is that your specific nitpick about imessage not having some specific text file and license associated with it, isn’t important in a world where there doesn’t exist an alternative that is nearly as robust and supported. Ultimately you are upset that imessage is run by a corporation (a valid complaint) but there is no indication that the corporation is lying to you about the privacy of their messaging service.

While in the ideal world a non-opensource app would be a deal breaker, in the current world, there is no indication that imessage has any privacy concerns associated with it. It’s not just taking Apple at their word, there have been a lot practical analysis of how the protocol works. Plus the underlying cryptography is sound.

https://security.apple.com/assets/files/Security_analysis_of_the_iMessage_PQ3_protocol_Stebila.pdf <- hosted by Apple.
https://www.douglas.stebila.ca/blog/archives/2024/02/21/imessage-pq3/ <-original author
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity25/sec25cycle1-prepub-595-linker.pdf <- Independent analysis of the protocol and implementation.

Sure you could claim that actually Apple is lying about how they are securing imessage, but that is a lot of effort when they could just take the Facebook approach and straight up admit that they have the ability to read your texts, much easier, and safer legally.

I am assuming a theoretical world where we have millions of people dedicated to mass action. In that world if those people were committed to not voting for Dems or Republicans and instead voting for any of the various socialist candidates at every governmental level, we would have a fully socialist (albeit different flavors of socialism) society in 6 years.

Obviously this is fantasy as people are not a collective, and passive participation in society results in “lesser of two evils” voting behavior and neuters any potential boycott pressure. Thus the status quo is propagated.

If a huge group of people had the discipline to consume less, they could do even more good by not voting for Capitalists every election. Then they could have their cake and eat it too.

Chasing the hot new app that was created by some one-person dev team for “privacy” reasons is a little like chasing amy. You are looking for an ideal app that doesn’t exist, so you can’t really suggest a better alternative. Instead you are just nagging people for using discord or imessage even though those apps are perfectly fine for 99% of people. Even privacy focused people. imessaage specifically is great for privacy and unless you have strong evidence of an apple installed backdoor for the p2p imessage encryption I’d question why your are against it.

Obviously this is all preliminary, and the US Border Control Service has zero credibility, but this actually sounds like they did some investigation and Hyundai was actually breaking the law by importing South Koreans, on non-work visa’s and then having them work at their state subsidized plant instead of hiring local workers. Apparently some executives/managers were arrested as well which doesn’t fit the normal modus operandi for ICE terror raids.

Just tie it in with minimum wage reform that your “paid” hours start one hour before you are scheduled to work, and end one hour after you are “off the clock.” Mandate a minimum of 40 paid hours a week for all employees, and no more then 12 scheduled hours within a 24 hour period.