• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    How odd. I have never heard of .world filtering based on VPN usage, although it’s been some time since I used that instance regularly.

    • Mose13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In my experience, many Lemmy instances block what looks like bot traffic. I don’t think it’s as simple as VPN = blocked, but that’s probably one of the signals they pay attention to. I’ve noticed most comments will fail to post when I’m using Mullvad.

        • Mose13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          I’m totally guessing but I’m guessing it’s more similar to:

          • Accessing from a business owned IP: +20% risk of abuse
          • Accessing from C country: +10% risk of abuse
          • The rate that you’re making requests: +5% risk of abuse
          • Etc

          Block if risk of abuse exceeded X%

          I have no idea what I’m talking about, but I can’t imagine these companies aren’t using some pretty advanced detection of bot traffic

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I can read without issue but more often than not posting comments or indeed posts fails unless I pause for 5 mins.

      E. This went through without disconnecting as an example. Can’t figure out if threshold a pattern

      • io@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        maybe the particular server of the vpn haz problems? have your tried switching that around?