You’re really willing to die on the hill of poop camera subscriptions, I’m not willing to waste time diving further into the subject. You’re ignorant of the topic, which is fine, but I won’t be the one explaining further.
I’m not dying on anything, I’m just having a discussion. It’s what I come here to do. If you don’t want to discuss it, that’s fine, but the name calling is unnecessary.
you’re not having a discussion, you’re sealioning. You’re not providing any arguments or evidence in favour of your point, just requesting endless amounts of information from your interlocutor.
I haven’t provided any arguments because this isn’t an argument, it’s a discussion. I haven’t made an affirmative position either way, at any time. I’m just asking questions and learning. Sorry if that offends you.
Because there is more that goes into telling if someone is unhealthy than just looking at their stool. And the few signs that DEFINITELY point to health issues would be assessable by the average person just looking at their poop.
Sure, and there’s more that goes into telling if someone is unhealthy than just looking at their blood oxygen levels or heart rate or arrhythmia, but these are still valuable indicators that we already track and look for symptoms pointing to a potential issue.
Plus health is not binary, it’s a spectrum, and looking at your feces can give be an indicator of where specifically your gut health lands on that spectrum.
And why not?
Because it’s an incredibly unreliable data point by itself, and requires significantly more than visual analysis to prevent several co-variables.
Who said it had to be used by itself?
You’re really willing to die on the hill of poop camera subscriptions, I’m not willing to waste time diving further into the subject. You’re ignorant of the topic, which is fine, but I won’t be the one explaining further.
I’m not dying on anything, I’m just having a discussion. It’s what I come here to do. If you don’t want to discuss it, that’s fine, but the name calling is unnecessary.
you’re not having a discussion, you’re sealioning. You’re not providing any arguments or evidence in favour of your point, just requesting endless amounts of information from your interlocutor.
I haven’t provided any arguments because this isn’t an argument, it’s a discussion. I haven’t made an affirmative position either way, at any time. I’m just asking questions and learning. Sorry if that offends you.
Except you made the argument about professional analysis of your poop…
I did no such thing and you know I didn’t.
Because there is more that goes into telling if someone is unhealthy than just looking at their stool. And the few signs that DEFINITELY point to health issues would be assessable by the average person just looking at their poop.
Sure, and there’s more that goes into telling if someone is unhealthy than just looking at their blood oxygen levels or heart rate or arrhythmia, but these are still valuable indicators that we already track and look for symptoms pointing to a potential issue.
Plus health is not binary, it’s a spectrum, and looking at your feces can give be an indicator of where specifically your gut health lands on that spectrum.