• Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Okay, if they are against the Constitution, and war crimes became constitutional, does that then make them against war crimes? (This assumes they have any actual logic, a very big ask)

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They don’t define themselves by supporting the opposite of what’s in the Constitution, they just don’t give a shit about what’s in it.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Very good point. I mean they’re also not against the Second Amendment. Just every other one. They’ll come up with some “logic” though. It’s probably someone’s LGBTQ+ neighbour’s dog at fault or the immigrants. War crimes are fine if committed by someone with a MAGA hat and they’ll demand death penalty if it’s a democrat. And before we get to discuss the logic behind this, there will be the next fresh fuss whipped up and burying this. Like this one is probably again some bullshit to cover the Epstein files or whatever.