- cross-posted to:
- books@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- books@lemmy.world
The headline here is a bit misleading, what he actually said was:
"Who’s to know? [Technology firms] are spending trillions and trillions on AI and maybe it’s going to produce the next War and Peace.
"And if people want to read that book, AI-generated or not, we will be selling it - as long as it doesn’t pretend to [be] something that it isn’t.
“We as booksellers would certainly naturally and instinctively disdain it,” Daunt said.
Readers value a connection with the author “that does require a real person”, he added. Any AI-generated book would always be clearly labelled as such.
My revised headline is:
Waterstones boss would rather not sell books generated by AI, but might if they are correctly labelled.
You must log in or # to comment.
And yet you still used the horribly misleading headline as the post title. Good job.
Chris is probably just following the comm rule against editorialising titles.
I hate that original headline skew. Thanks for the clarity
It’ll be ok as the way things are going, the readers will be AIs who will summarise and review books for Youtube channels watched by AIs who go on to write books for… dead culture. It’s ok because the masses will be watching Strictly Come Hunger Games Dancing.
We are finally free from the oppressive yoke of reading
That trashy company is funding Israel.
In the 80s, comic book art was produced entirely with computer based art tools. It didn’t raise an eyebrow beyond “Oh, that’s neat!”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shatter_(digital_comic)
https://totally-epic.kwakk.info/2020/01/15/1988-iron-man-crash/
In 2025, this comment was produced entirely with computer based typing tools. It didn’t raise an eyebrow beyond “Oh, that’s moronic!”
By artists, yes.
What’s your point?
Computer based art was being used to sell books in bookstores 40 years ago.
They didn’t really sell well, and now, barely anyone remembers it was a thing.
And that relates to a book shop selling LLM-written books how? Digital artists still draw what’s attributed to them, an AI author hasn’t written what’s attributed to them.
AI is a little bit more complicated than that due to the flaws that pop up in generating.
For example, here are some AI comic books that were created. What the author did was write the overall story, then used an AI prompt to create each panel of the comic.
Each panel took dozens to hundreds of attempts, out of which the author made the artistic decision to choose the best one.
“The Lesson” is probably my favorite of the bunch, but they’re free to download, check them out.
https://aicomicbooks.com/book/the-lesson-book-by-steve-coulson-download-now/
In the 2020s, books were written entirely with computer based writing tools.
It’s called vim.
It didn’t raise an eyebrow beyond “Don’t you mean emacs?”
Which has what exactly to do with the topic?
