sbg@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agothe internet is worse.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down132
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imagethe internet is worse.lemmy.worldsbg@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-squareBetch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down1·2 years ago12ft.io is your friend
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·2 years agoOr disabling js. Most of you use ublock origin. Ublock has a setting to disable JavaScript and you can whitelist sites you want js
minus-square👁️👄👁️@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoDisabling js does not bypass these article limits, idk why this is being upvoted.
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoOn some websites it does. For example, it’s worked for me on newyorktimes
minus-squarez3rOR0ne@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 years agoTrue, but that’s yet another step every time I want to read an article. Personally i just use ublock origin and add this custom filter list. And yeah, you can also turn off JS to accomplish a lot while browsing the internet.
minus-square👁️👄👁️@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoThey’re not asking to get around it, they’re pointing out shitty practices that are common now.
12ft.io is your friend
Or disabling js. Most of you use ublock origin. Ublock has a setting to disable JavaScript and you can whitelist sites you want js
Disabling js does not bypass these article limits, idk why this is being upvoted.
On some websites it does. For example, it’s worked for me on newyorktimes
True, but that’s yet another step every time I want to read an article. Personally i just use ublock origin and add this custom filter list.
And yeah, you can also turn off JS to accomplish a lot while browsing the internet.
They’re not asking to get around it, they’re pointing out shitty practices that are common now.