rThis is an anarchist comm. While many anarchists consider themselves socialists: I don’t think it’s a good look to come into an anarchist comm and talk about how “actual socialists” don’t do that. Could be seen as violating a rule here, even.
Individualist anarchists reject the social contract outright. But those are relatively rare.
There is a critique that contracts should be entered consentually. And collectivist anarchists generally are in favour of freedom of association. But you could argue that this is merely a semantic argument about social contract theory.
And usually into stirner, which is problematic as fuck and frequently hard to take seriously but several orders of magnitude less fucking stupid than sovcits.
Some kind of mutually agreed upon means of a community organizing itself perhaps, where even if an individual didn’t decide them personally engaging within it binds them to a code of behavior?
Dumbass lol.
Like I said, all real socialists understand social contracts.
Some kind of mutually agreed upon means of a community organizing itself perhaps, where even if an individual didn’t decide them personally engaging within it binds them to a code of behavior?
That sentence is in reference to what, exactly? That sentence is unnecessarily hard to parse.
Dumbass lol.
First of all: rude and uncalled for. Second: That’s rich from someone who thinks pointing out that an anarchist community has rules is a gotcha. 🙄
Like I said, all real socialists understand social contracts.
Good for them. Got anything to add that’s not a non-sequitur?
rThis is an anarchist comm. While many anarchists consider themselves socialists: I don’t think it’s a good look to come into an anarchist comm and talk about how “actual socialists” don’t do that. Could be seen as violating a rule here, even.
Individualist anarchists reject the social contract outright. But those are relatively rare.
There is a critique that contracts should be entered consentually. And collectivist anarchists generally are in favour of freedom of association. But you could argue that this is merely a semantic argument about social contract theory.
And usually into stirner, which is problematic as fuck and frequently hard to take seriously but several orders of magnitude less fucking stupid than sovcits.
Oh violating the anarchist community rules huh
Some kind of mutually agreed upon means of a community organizing itself perhaps, where even if an individual didn’t decide them personally engaging within it binds them to a code of behavior?
Dumbass lol.
Like I said, all real socialists understand social contracts.
You’re confusing anomy with anarchy.
That sentence is in reference to what, exactly? That sentence is unnecessarily hard to parse.
First of all: rude and uncalled for. Second: That’s rich from someone who thinks pointing out that an anarchist community has rules is a gotcha. 🙄
Good for them. Got anything to add that’s not a non-sequitur?
I think what they’re going for in the current context of the meme is something like:
“I didn’t contract with this comm, therefore the mods can’t tell me what to do.”
But then they shouldn’t interact with it. By commenting, they agree to the rules.
Now you get it, liberals.
Well, that’s not fair, liberals understand social contracts too, it’s just ancaps and the people with their brand of brain rot that pretend not to.