alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前A Universal Basic Income Is Being Considered by Canada's Governmentwww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square231fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down132cross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1external-linkA Universal Basic Income Is Being Considered by Canada's Governmentwww.vice.comalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square231fedilinkcross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squarewombatula@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 年前 literally no downside except for needing to tax the rich So literally no downside at all then?
minus-squarepomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前Can’t eat them and tax them at the same time 😞
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前There are downsides. Some people require more income to stay alive than others. Think of people with decreased mental or physical capabilities. Those would loose a big chunk, which need to be subsidised somehow. But the upsides outweigh the downsides.
minus-squarewombatula@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Not necessarily, that depends on how it shakes down.
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前It’s a political downside, because anything involving taxes will turn some people against it.
So literally no downside at all then?
Can’t eat them and tax them at the same time 😞
There are downsides.
Some people require more income to stay alive than others. Think of people with decreased mental or physical capabilities.
Those would loose a big chunk, which need to be subsidised somehow.
But the upsides outweigh the downsides.
Not necessarily, that depends on how it shakes down.
It’s a political downside, because anything involving taxes will turn some people against it.