@FUCKER@lemmy.world to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoreminderlemmy.worldimagemessage-square186fedilinkarrow-up11.65Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.64Karrow-down1imagereminderlemmy.world@FUCKER@lemmy.world to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square186fedilink
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·2 years agoEasily. The device doesn’t care who owns it, you can use one owned by another person.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·2 years agoI don’t know anyone who owns one either. But go ahead, do your experiment and report back. Should only take you 5 minutes to prove your claim.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 years agoWhy should I do it, when plenty of people have already done so, and reported the results I talked about?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·2 years agoAre you unable to Google, or are you acting willfully dense? First example I found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-018-1174-x
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 years agoLol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoNo, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 years agoSo you gonna spot me the $40?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoWhy would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient? Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
Easily. The device doesn’t care who owns it, you can use one owned by another person.
I don’t know anyone who owns one either.
But go ahead, do your experiment and report back. Should only take you 5 minutes to prove your claim.
Why should I do it, when plenty of people have already done so, and reported the results I talked about?
Like who?
Are you unable to Google, or are you acting willfully dense?
First example I found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-018-1174-x
Lol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
No, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
So you gonna spot me the $40?
Why would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient?
Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?