• NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, well since you like being pedantic and hiding behind semantics here is the Oxford definition.

    You can spend all day yelling at them.

    I have called you out on your what i will assume is misinformation instead of disinformation.

    It’s your move, do you argue against the factual definition?

    • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      First you didn’t not include a definition. Second, dictionaries aren’t authoritative sources but rather descriptive ones. If you need that explained to you then you are ill equipped for any academic discussion.

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are right I did forget here you go.

        Dictionary
        Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
        ter·ror·ist
        noun
        a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
        “four commercial aircraft were hijacked by terrorists”
        Similar:
        bomber
        arsonist
        incendiary
        gunman
        assassin
        desperado
        hijacker
        revolutionary
        radical
        guerrilla
        urban guerrilla
        subversive
        anarchist
        freedom fighter
        insurrectionist
        insurrectionary
        adjective
        unlawfully using violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
        “a terrorist organization”

        • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ll note nowhere on that list of synonyms are terms used for militaries. That’s not by accident. It’s because national militaries aren’t terrorist groups.

      • TheBeege@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Correct. There is no authority in language except French. So your pedantic arguments are also flawed. Your own argument works against you

          • TheBeege@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry, what is called the Lingua Franca? I missed which part you’re referencing

            I only made the French comment because the French government has an official entity granted the authority to define the official French language.

            • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The lingua Franca is the main tongue used in the world at the time. It’s called that because it used to be French, now it’s English.

              You’re one of today’s lucky 10,000!

        • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is also ones for other languages.

          Regardless the point is a dictionary does not define words but rather describes how they are used. Even if it covered national militaries, which it does not, it wouldn’t support your claim. In fact it would be an “appeal to authority”