• andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, I agree 100%, we should prioritize that. But $100 Billion is $300/person. We need to change a lot about the effectiveness of the American medical system to make it work for less because $300/person right now will get you like an annual checkup at our inflated cost of care.

    • shadysus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US spends more than any other country on healthcare, on TOP of what individuals pay for things like insurance.

      The reason it all looks so expensive is because of how much money goes to shareholders and corporations. So yep, it could be a whole lot cheaper

      • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, agreed with you entirely. That’s the part that needs to change though. Because it doesn’t just look expensive, it is expensive. Because it does still go to corporations, and without changing the system, they’re not going to give that up.

        • shadysus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes that’s true, bad wording on my part when trying to talk about how much things should actually cost

    • ClaireDeLuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      $300/p could more or less cover a good chunk of the US population though. It’d be a good start and in theory take some of the stress off of the insurer. Far from ideal but it could’ve been a good step.

      You’d think $300 would cover the Dentist, Eye Doctor, and Annual checkups and some cheaper prescriptions. But I will admit idk if the pricing we see is much different from other pricing.