• MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is the question:

    live in an unjust and amoral society

    or die trying to make a righteous one.

    The stoics, at least Seneca, opted for the former.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He really wasn’t given much of a choice. He just chose his stance on the one option he had.

      • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Seneca was one of the wealthiest Romans of his time.

        He more than 99% of the Empire had a choice. He happened to be rich and choose status quo. Who ever would have guessed that ?

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      or die trying to make a righteous one.

      . . . and realize that your new, righteous society will quickly collapse into corruption and amorality because a society is filled with people.