anarchotoothbrushist@lemmy.ml to Anarchist Memes @lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前sex work is workfeddit.deexternal-linkmessage-square287fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down175cross-posted to: dank_left@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1974arrow-down1external-linksex work is workfeddit.deanarchotoothbrushist@lemmy.ml to Anarchist Memes @lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square287fedilinkcross-posted to: dank_left@lemmy.ml
minus-squareflerp@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·1 年前In that case I might respectfully suggest looking into an introductory course to logic if you’re at all interested. http://intrologic.stanford.edu/chapters/chapter_01.html
minus-squareUlyssesT@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·edit-23 个月前deleted by creator
minus-squareAniki 🌱🌿@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down7·edit-21 年前Why? Perhaps you should take a look at how to form an argument.
minus-squareursakhiin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前You made an incredibly bad faith argument with this comment. The arguments the person you are debating made was that the US Army was involved in liberating people in concentration camps. Your argument was that British and Soviet forces were involved. Both statements are true. Yours did not invalidate theirs.
I think it does. :shrug:
In that case I might respectfully suggest looking into an introductory course to logic if you’re at all interested. http://intrologic.stanford.edu/chapters/chapter_01.html
deleted by creator
Why? Perhaps you should take a look at how to form an argument.
You made an incredibly bad faith argument with this comment.
The arguments the person you are debating made was that the US Army was involved in liberating people in concentration camps.
Your argument was that British and Soviet forces were involved.
Both statements are true. Yours did not invalidate theirs.