Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, in his first remarks after being elected Wednesday afternoon, told Members of Congress that “Scripture” and “the Bible” are clear that they have been “ordained” by God.

  • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Democrats should name all their laws after the Bible. Eye of the Needle bill: wealth tax and just demagogue that we need to pass this to save American souls. Mark 1:40 bill: universal healthcare

    • Iunnrais@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I legitimately and unironically would support this initiative. It’s a good idea.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a great idea but unfortunately it has some significant flaws.

      First, I imagine quite a lot of the Christianity in American politics is performative. The politicians could just hand wave away the passages and say “That’s not what Jesus meant, he personally told me so”.

      The fundamentalists suckers would believe them and vote for them even harder and the ones that are drawn to religion for the excuse to abuse people won’t care as long as their abusive itches get scratched.

      The other problem is that if it did work, it’s comes across as more than a little Christofascist.

      The far-right and religious “in it for abuse” crowds would take to it like flies to dog shit and the bible has some horrific stuff in it that you’d definitely never want becoming law.

      Better to just pry fundamentalists and neoliberals from power so all they can do is seethe while progressives pass these kinds of laws. With genuine end times just around the corner, time is a factor.

      • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Republicans will always find a way. Even if it contradicts what they just said a minute prior. You’re not gonna stop suckers from going along with ppl using them for power/money. We should just take the win.

      • Slotos@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        a lot of the Christianity in American politics is performative

        That’s the point. Break suspension of disbelief and see the stage crumble.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The biggest flaw is democrats have too much tact. They couldn’t possibly offend the people trying to oppress their constitutes.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even Jesus thought so. “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” means exactly that.

          • GONADS125@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Bringing up God summoning 2 bears to slaughter 42 children for calling one of his deciples a “baldhead” is always a fun tid bit!

            I would not call that a just or kind god.

            • evranch@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Many of the OT stories are horrifying. Book of Job is probably the worst, where a petty God destroys a good and pious man to win a wager with Satan.

              Who would be interested in worshipping a God who would do such a thing to his own followers, and whose omnipotence is so limited that he can be tricked by Satan into performing evil acts?

      • bemenaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Come on man, that would take way too much intelligence and critical thinking skill, for GOP voters to understand.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Prosperity theology” often goes hand in hand with neoliberalism.

      If you’re not quite psychopathic enough for “I don’t care about the morality of using child slaves, only the profitability”, you can assuage that guilt with “If God didn’t want me to profit from child slavery, he would have stopped me doing it”.

    • Feirdro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a multinational crime syndicate masquerading as a political party.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like even the smart ones who built rockets and bombs saw us killing nazis and were like “yeah that’s probably for the best”

      • Ænima@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of Nazis, the high ranking ones, fucked off to Venezuela and other places when they saw the end in sight and knew their necks were on the line (literally in some cases) if caught. I can imagine some used their stolen wealth to continue that brand of hate for the last 80+ years. “The smart ones” were intentionally sabotaging the Nazi war effort and defecting to the Allies with information on the Nazis’ attempts at nuclear weapons. A lot of those scientists were never allowed to leave or live past the end of the war in Nazi Germany.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were inspired by our fascists. Bringing them here change things so little that even the number of fascists overall in the United States and barely had a bump in their growth.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is the difference between this guy and a Taliban officer?

    I don’t care how much he enjoys talking about his favorite fairy tale novel, congress is not a book club.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, but that’s totally different! You see, their holy book is just a bunch of heathenish drivel, whereas our holy book is the one and only god given truth! How do I know? It says so right here in my holy book!

      • bemenaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had some bible thumping baptist going door to door tell me almost exactly that. I had time, and decided to amuse myself in engaging these two guys. I talked to them for about 20 mins before they left. I kept asking them to compare their religion to various religions around the world, including eastern relgiions, and was quoting passages from many of them. These guys clearly had never studied anything but their version of christianity. Their only defense was, “But this was written by our lord and savior, Jesus Christ”

        • XTL@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          But this was written by our lord and savior, Jesus Christ

          Did they say which part? I’m no theologian, but I don’t remember mentions of any actual writings by Jesus himself.

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The argument usually is that the authors, compilers, and translators were guided by the hand of God. Not specifically that Jesus was sitting down with an inkwell.

            Closest thing is written accounts by the men who traveled with him about Jesus’s actions and statements.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            He didn’t exist so he couldn’t have written anything. If he had existed and was raised in Nazareth he would have been in a village so small that it didn’t even have a place to pray and in a region so backwards that the literacy rate was around 1%. There are no works that people claim that he wrote. Even that was a bridge too far for them. Walking on water was more believable than being literate in that region.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is the difference between this guy and a Taliban officer?

      That’s an easy mistake to make, this guy’s a Talibangelical

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same God, different prophet. So not much really. Except maybe that Taliban don’t ban abortion as far as I’m aware.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I believe that Scripture, the Bible is very clear that God is the one that raises up those in authority.”

    Oh, so since God raised Biden to Authority that means you’re going to respect God’s plan right?

    Lol… Yeah… You’ll all continue to pay lip service to the Bible as long as it serves your purpose.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah. This sort of talk in a lot of organized religion is a well-established cue to the listener that they can shut off their critical thinking. The intended audience is accustomed to hearing it and welcomes it, because they have the same goal as the one who says it: to have the thing they want be right.

      So their minds don’t start extrapolating to see if the words hold up to scrutiny. That’s the last thing they’d want to do.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I move to change

      pay lip service to to manipulate and contort

      Especially considering religious leaders are taking Jesus OUT if their sermons because he is too liberal for them.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I read this as a Judas joke which I loved, hopefully I wasn’t correct or my comment is dumb for pointing out the obvious. Lol

          • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Gods I hate that guy. Why so many people don’t question why they should listen uncritically to the guy who hit his head on a rock and hallucinated Jesus and used the whole thing as a thinly veiled reason to tell people how to behave is just…

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I am sorry but I think you are a woman and I don’t permit you to preach or led me. Go ask your husband at home to explain it to you.

              Now if you ask me I have a convoluted manifesto to write about the humanity of Jesus that proves that I can eat bacon. Let me send you 90 letters on the topic.

              • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah well, half right. I definitely have a husband but am also not a woman so I think I am probably disqualified from discourse on other stupid rules that Paul completely made up.

                You got any extra bacon to share though?

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ah well, half right. I definitely have a husband but am also not a woman

                  Bad news about that. He singled out the LGBT freaken twice for hell fire. Lived in a world where slaves could be executed on a whim and this is the group he decided to go after.

                  You got any extra bacon to share though?

                  I would but Paul told me I would die if I didn’t give him all my bacon.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you expect when your government is comprised of a bunch of greedy scummy lawyers.

      They will say literally anything to get power. Speech is rhetoric and they care nothing about reality.

      • Nima@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        god isn’t a good guy. he’s a villain. they can have him.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, just the Abrahmic god that decided to flood the world and kill nearly everyone on it innocent or not.

            • jeremyparker@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              “Kill your son.”

              “What…?”

              “Do it, prove to me that you care more about doing what I say than you do about your own son.”

              “Are you serious? That’s horrible.”

              “Fucking do it. You want to spend infinite lifetimes in permanent anguish? Kill him. Now. Cut him open on that big flat rock over there. Gut him with a big fuck off knife, like a sword or something. Slice him up.”

              “But he’s my son, I live him.”

              “Sharpen the knife first then. Kill him, or I kill you, and him, and the rest of your family.”

              “Ok, but, ffs, this is insane…”

              “Haha I was just foolin, you don’t have to. I was just joshin. Just joshin with ya.”

              “Should I… Do you want me to kill my son or…”

              “WTF no! I was just messing around. But seriously don’t ever disobey me or you’re fucking done.”

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope, talking about the one who told his followers to rip fetuses out of the bellies of pregnant women and smash them against the rocks, and to take any virgin girl children they find as sex slaves

          • Nima@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            yahweh’s murder count is well over 2 million. he’s pretty much the god of murder.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be clear there is no god. Also to be clear the stories you have about your god describe a poorly written villain who even if it were real, again it isn’t, deserves nothing from humanity except contempt.

  • Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    And the Constitution and its Amendments are very clear about a separation of church and state.

      • EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

        This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

        The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be Required as a Qualification To any Office or public Trust under the United States.

        Specifically, I like this line here, that was present in the third paragraph I quoted from the Constitution:

        no religious Test shall ever be Required as a Qualification To any Office or public Trust under the United States.

        Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t that mean that we specifically don’t care if God, Allah, Buddha, or whoever says they are supposed to be in power?

        Edit: and since we both want to be dickheads, today, why don’t you show me where it says in the Constitution to base our laws around the bible?

        • Galapagon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          None of that says that church and state must be separate, just that there can be no religious test. There’s nothing in there barring him from saying “I think God blesses the people here”

          In fact, to really be edgy, that also doesn’t prevent the government from say donating $10B each year to some Christian church.

          To your second point, I never suggested that the Constitution says we should base our laws around the Bible.

          My only point is the oft quoted Separation of church and state is only an idea from the Jefferson papers. If you want to make sure church and state remain separate, and the new speaker doesn’t start using federal funds for his church, perhaps it’s time to actually put separation into the Constitution?

          • EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If no qualifying religious measure can be used to install a person into office, it stands to reason that religious belief shouldn’t come into play.

            I would hope our (the US’) political system would be aware enough that writing private funding into any religious system would be seen as favoritism and the remaining belief systems would be righteously offended at the lack of consideration, or perhaps even the outright rejection of our beliefs.

            This nation was built on immigrants (and the blood of natives, but that isn’t what we are discussing) from every walk of life, every religious circle. To disregard others in favor of your own belief SHOULD be political suicide. These elected officials, after all, supposed to be elected to help with the concerns of the WHOLE populous, after all, not just a specific subset.

            Playing religious favoritism has a high potential to try to convert the country into a religious state, as funding continues to be funneled into these specific religions, and in turn the churches funnel money back into the candidates as lobbying.

            Coming to that point, does anyone who wants to to fund the church with government money which would be better used to take homeless off the streets, feed homeless children, or making people’s lives in general, don’t have the people’s, or even God’s best interests at heart?

            Do they tithe their first ten percent, as the Bible says? Surely it would be in their tax records as charitable donations? If not, that would make me even more suspect of their intentions.

  • ohmyiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He did it. He said the magic words that turn on a neverending money tap from “christian” conservatives who aren’t smart enough to tell when they’re getting grifted.

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, that’s because they’ve been indoctrinated since birth into a cult that exists to gift people.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having said this- he should be disqualified from office.

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seditionist asshat shouldn’t even be allowed to be in politics anymore. The more we allow people to try to overturn elections, the more impossible it will be to stay a democracy.