• Scolding7300@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That’s a decision of the app maker. I think they shouldn’t, it’ll help people become aware of and use f-droid instead of Google’s products IMO

    • nudny ekscentryk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      don’t they break Google’s TOS by circumventing YouTube access control?

      • GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        They do. And blocking ads in ad based services also violates the play store ToS… No idea how GreyJey got passed Google’s censors.

        • nudny ekscentryk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          so I thought — therefore my original question, no idea why so many people downvoted it

          • GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            People probably took that as a passive aggressive attack against the app and a show of support for Google/YouTube’s ad blocking policies. Try not to take it personally, people round here and back on Reddit always have their hackles permanently raised when it comes to issues like these.