• Cloudkid@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      93
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t like Elon Musk, his buyout of Twitter was horibble and I don’t agree with many stuff he says, that begin said

      story about Musk’s father once owning an emerald mine evolved into a larger rumor that had no evidence to support its central claim. Source

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        86
        ·
        1 year ago

        According to the article, the “rumor” started in 2014 when Elon went on an interview tour and SAID that his dad had an emerald mine to multiple publications. He told an elaborate story to one about riding in his dad’s plane full of emeralds and ak-47s

        The research couldn’t find financial proof of any claimed debt, since Elon won’t provide any. But “hand shake” deals about illegal emerald smuggling tends not to have a paper trail.

        Then, a year after this article came out, Elon tweeted “I’ll give a million doge to anyone who can prove it existed” and his dad replied that it existed and that Elon had been there.

        Errol also went on an interview tour (after this article was posted) and told multiple publications that he did own a share of an emerald mining business. But Elon wasn’t lying because it technically wasn’t in a hole, but an outcropping!

        Since changing his mind on the subject, Elon had since only admitted that his start up was supported by selling his own PC for 2k, a 5k gift from his “bro” and 8k from some other guy. But later a SmAaLL LoAn (as they like to say) of 200k from his dad and others. But that was later, you guys.

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t get why people focus on the emerald mine aspect. Turning 200k into billions would be impressive regardless of where the initial cash came from, if he wasn’t just some lucky schmuck who’s shitty website got bought out in the Dotcom bubble.

          Edit: Yikes, goes to show that Lemmy users can’t finish reading a comment lol

              • BossDj@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Welp we had “Elon used emerald money” then “no evidence of that!” To “Here’s evidence” and your thought “Well is wasn’t much!”

                Very apologist.

                It’s never surprising to me when billionaires had wealthy parents. Hiding money is their jam.

                • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not the person you replied to initially, I never said he didn’t have emerald money. Lol did you think it’s just you and one other person on the internet?

                  And apologist? The fuck are you talking about, my point is that Elon Musk is a fucking loser that won the lottery in the Dotcom bubble. Websites aren’t expensive, he didn’t need capital. He’s a narcissist who got lucky and mistook it for genius.

                  But seriously, can you people really not read two sentences before deciding someone is a “billionaire apologist”? Jesus dude.

      • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed, not a whole emerald mine, the same source:

        We located reporting from as far back as 2009 and 2014 that said when Elon Musk (“Elon” hereafter) was a child in South Africa in the 1980s, his father (“Errol” hereafter) at some point owned “a stake in an emerald mine” near Lake Tanganyika in Zambia, not South Africa.

      • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a filter on Sync to not see Musk content, yet somehow he keeps leaking in.

        On Lemmy, it’s like a party game to see where you can get Musk into a thread.

        • ruckblack@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think sync has filtered comments yet, which is annoying. I still see hexbear garbage in the comments sometimes.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You might be thinking that getting an x-ray every day is bad for the miners, but this is a ye-olde look through machine. Yes it’s bad for the miners, but the guy looking at it is putting his face and uppee body right in the beam here. And I’m guessing he does hundreds of these a day.

    Then again, old timey x-ray machines were pretty soft, so (edit) AND the miner is getting big dose of alpha and beta radiation too. And at least the technician isn’t breathing coal dust, so it’s probably a toss up who gets cancers first.

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both people in this picture are being abused by the company. The difference is that the company also lets the white guy abuse the black guy, and for that reason, the white guy feels superior.

      This is one of those things you see in fascist governments. As long as people are able to abuse someone, they’ll accept a much worse station as well as a lot of abuse themselves.

    • zzzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, the real contest is who gets the most cancer. Gotta catch 'em all!

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Tar_alcaran … if the miners even lived long enough to get cancer.

      Diamond miners during Apartheid were working in unsafe conditions for ridiculously low wages, often coerced into being there, and at relatively high risk of tuberculosis.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      but the guy looking at it is putting his face and uppee body right in the beam here

      Ah, but he’s wearing gloves, so he’ll be fine.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      X-ray tubes, old and new, use high energy electrons that impact a metal to create the beam. Alpha and beta emission is from radioactive decay which is an entirely different phenomenon. But yes bathing your body in X-rays is bad for you

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sorry, I had a brainfart there. You’re completely right.

        The tube itself emits xrays, but soft xrays have a very high chance of being absorbed by Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen. And since that’s mostly what makes up a human, that’s kinda bad.

        Also he’s digging up diamonds, which is in rocks full of radioactive materials. Diamond mine tailings are famously radioactive (and interesting) due all the thorium and radium in them.

  • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 year ago

    This looks like a fluoroscope, basically an X-ray that is constantly turned on. The tech is looking at a live X-ray view, not a film transparency.

    The radiologic exposure for both of them is orders of magnitude higher than a normal x-ray that we think about. A normal xray exposes you for less than a second, this is bombarding him with X-rays the entire time he is standing there.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s bad for them, but imagine this doctor. He has to examine every one of them every day. If he didn’t die of cancer he must not have lived very long.

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just because a guy in the past was a doctor doing shitty things is no reason to shit on x-ray techs. We really shouldn’t put one type of work above another.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              X-ray techs don’t have a hippocratic oath to violate. That’s the thing separating the two in this context. If you don’t want to call him a technician, that’s fine, but he disqualified himself of being a doctor and I hope he got same the cancer he was giving out.

              • Vytle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I dont understand why your shitting on this guy. Whats he supposed to do, organize a coup in the slave mine? How do you know the tech wasnt trafficked himself?

                • livus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  @Vytle @Vytle Apartheid era South African history.

                  Basically the miners there are more likely to be coerced, through things like having been fined and the “pass” system, not trafficked.

                  In the case of the technician, he is almost certainly a free person. Working class whites normally earned at least 10x the wages in SA mines, even for the same job. But it is unclear whether he belongs to the Apartheid classification “white” or “coloured” (who had less rights and lower pay).

                  What people are shitting on is his participation in a system of oppression and segregation which devalued the lives of Black people. These mines had incredibly high tuberculosis rates too. He is also using medical technology in a reckless way that causes harm.

                  But I think you are right in pointing out that to some extent he is a victim of his situation /lack of education, even if he has more privileges and a better situation than the Black mine workers.

  • notaviking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know we still xray people at diamond mines here in South Africa. Try visiting a De Beers mine and see for yourself.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Try visiting a De Beers mine and see for yourself.

      I’m depressed enough as it is thank you.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Daily x-rays… Seems like that won’t have any impact to long term survival.

      What a humane way to prevent theft.

      • Kethal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I was wondering whether this was worse for the miners or the examiner. I’m sure that today modern technology protects the examiner more thoroughly and that they still don’t care about the miners. But I could be wrong. Maybe they don’t care about the examiner either.

        • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          My grandfather died in his 50s likely due to constant exposure from industrial xrays in the 50s and 60s. He was a college educated white guy in the US, so I’m guessing they give even fewer fucks about these guys.

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sorry for your loss.

            This is the reason why you can only get so many medical scans per year, to limit exposure. I’m sure the corporations who are running the equipment for non-medical reasons couldn’t give less of a shit, since caring doesn’t usually drive profits.

            It’s truly horrendous and should have never been allowed.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is pretty far down the list as far as reasons to not buy diamonds. They’re not rare. They’re not special. It’s a rock with limited industrial use.

      For added context, they’re still cutting the hands and feet off of dependents (including children) of miners to ensure they work hard.

  • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do wonder whether this was actually an effective way to look for them. Even with modern high resolution x-ray imaging it may be difficult to see the contrast between soft tissues and diamonds since they’re both primarily carbon

    bones show up well since they’re high in calcium, which has a much higher atomic number. Same with gold.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean if everyone tells you “we have a machine that can see through skin and can check if you have hidden diamonds” that would probably stop any attempts at theft that way. Even if it doesn’t actually see them. Also, diamonds out of the mine would be uncut, and probably easier to see.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s after the diamond has been cut. Raw diamond would be mostly encased in rock which would display differently

  • mvuvi@baraza.africa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Galton introduced fingerprinting in South Africa as an experiment after Indians introduced it to him. Managing miners using fingerprints was one of those moments capitalism and colonialism converged on science and technology and shaped the global sector we now call identification.

    For more, read The Biometric State by Keith Breckinridge.