Users of the Signal messaging app got hit by a hacker attack. We analyze what happened and why the attack demonstrates that Signal is reliable.

    • Jones@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 年前

      Oh, yet another messenger that pretends that it’s the only one that can prevent MITM. Abusive marketing, or plain misunderstanding of what e2ee means? Anyway I wouldn’t trust them just for that.

        • Jones@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 年前

          Not my point. Their webpage says that others (Signal included) are not protected against MITM (in the case of Signal, there is a note saying “if the server is compromised”). Which is plain wrong.

          • bkrl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 年前

            Are you aware that, just to start somewhere, Signal asks (and needs) your phone number to make the service work? If you write “go to hell” to a person and two minutes later you regret it that person can accuse you with absolutely legal evidence in his or her favor. Is everything normal?

            • Jones@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 年前

              First, that’s completely unrelated to the very concept of MITM. Second, it also shows that you have no clue about how such protocols work (in Signal, in SimpleX, or anywhere else). I really don’t understand why people who are really into secure messengers often don’t really care about how they actually work… I mean it is damn interesting!