• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sunbird is closed source so you just have to take their word for it when they say they don’t store messages or credentials. How the fuck could you know if they’re lying or not? You can’t because it’s closed source.

    As much as I have issues with the similar Beeper, at least Beeper is open sourcing their bridges.

    • ripe_banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just read through their faq

      Some of the messaging community believes that software that is open source is more secure. It is our view that it is not.

      That’s a nope from me.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah okay at first I thought “closed source isn’t necessarily a problem as long as there’s a good reason”.

        But nope. That’s the worst reason.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In other words: “Some of the messaging community believes that software that can be controled by the user and is clear how it works is doing what the user wants it to. It is our view that it is not.”

        They are just like the rest of big companies. Remember when Facebook was a privacy respecting and friendly alternative for MySpace? Or Apple for IBM? Or Google for other search engines?

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      They host their iMessage related shit the exact same way, so the amount of trust in the service is basically identical, at 0