Health experts say axing plan to block sales of tobacco products to next generation will cost thousands of lives

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This headline SCREAMS ‘conservative’:

    • bad for people
    • bad for healthcare
    • generate tax cuts … for the wealthy
    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      But think of the savings. Early death means budget surplus from hospice saved. /s

      Can someone that still has a twitter ask Dan Patrick to take one for the economy here?

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No surprise that it’s from an anti woke virtue signalling bunch of reactionary conservatives, then

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Amazinghorse that’s not really true. It won’t affect the bottom tax bracket. National have been pitching it as a tax cut for “middle income earners”.

        I just went and played around with their tax calculator and low income earners get almost nothing compared to wealthier people.

    • quindraco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      So it’s conservative to refuse to ban tobacco? Do you agree with the general consensus that it’s also conservative to ban marijuana? How do you square those two attitudes, if so?

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @quindraco in the New Zealand context yes it’s extremely conservative. This government is a lot more conservative than previous right-wing govts.

        The “smokefree” policies were created by the Maori Party, whose constituency is disproportionately harmed by smoking.

        If marijuana was killing thousands of Maori they would probably have wanted to but it isn’t.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s conservative to bend over and spread `em for the benefit of the owning class at the expense of everyone else - chiefly the workers those politicians claim to represent.

        Others have pointed out the gaping differences in the health outcomes (including the burden that places on the healthcare system), addiction rates, etc.