Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe that Google wanted in-app purchases in Fortnite to go through Play Store so that Google would get 30%. And Epic wanted to setup their own in-app billing and keep it all.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          82
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of this case hinged on the fact that Google wasn’t treating everyone the same. They had a lot of private details for big companies.

          Unless Apple also has secret deals, then this isn’t going to impact them.

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Apple wouldn’t need to have secret deals. They’re running a walled garden over there. You can’t side load, and you can’t run payments through the app without Apple’s approval. That case was about Apple forcing developers not to even talk in the app about the possibility of making a purchase elsewhere, like through their websites. It wasn’t a deal, it was Apple strong-arming a developer because they could.

            The problem is Google wanted to have what Apple has: a closed ecosystem they can exploit. But they don’t have that, at least not to the same degree. Android is not “theirs”, even if they’ve increasingly managed to make the Play Store more inseparable as time has gone by, and getting worse about that all the time.

            The most they can do is scare people away from using third party app stores or doing anything with Android they don’t approve of, and when it comes to things like Play Integrity and Play Protection, they can punish you for stepping outside their bounds by breaking certain functionality (for having the audacity to want to control your own device).

            But they can’t outright control anything.

            Which is where the deals come in. They’re making shady deals to keep Android as their money maker and no one elses.

            It’s anti-competitive, because to spite Google’s efforts, there is an actual opportunity for competition on Android, where as on iPhone, there isn’t.

        • Album@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          By enforcing a rule that says apps on the app store cannot have an external paid app store. So that’s why you download FN on sideload instead of the store.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No I think Google tried to tell Epic they couldn’t have their own processing for in-app purchases. That’s what Epic sued over.

          • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are multiple entities with their own payment processing mechanisms running on Android. Epic was definitely able to run their own if they wanted to.

            • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Many of them are either exceptions made by Google through shady deals or apps that were overlooked by Google before they published the app.

              • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s exactly what sunk Google’s case though. They’re inconsistent. Had they most likely shown they’re consistent to other apps they could have been more likely to get a jury on their side (like in the case with Apple).

            • bassomitron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Google and Apple both banned Fortnite from their respective app stores and that’s what caused Epic to sue both of them in the first place.

              • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s more that Epic added their own payment system to the app (and offered, IIRC, a roughly 30% decrease in Vbucks price for people who opted to use it instead), Google and Apple both responded by removing the app, and then Epic sued them both and even aired a special presentation in Fortnite. All in the same day. Epic intentionally did this.

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, then you won’t even be able to use in-app purchases.

          Android supposedly has an option to side load, and even install another store, but in order to do it, you get through a series of warnings, and such stores can’t even be on the play store. So for an ordinary user you feel like you are hacking the phone. So naturally there aren’t many alternatives. The only one that lasted is F-Droid, but it seems to be only used by advanced users who want to run open source software.

          So simply, theoretically they should be able to do whatever they want practically everyone has to stick to play store.

          Play store has a rule, that additional charges need to go through them (and they of course charge 30%). This probably would still be ok, but then certain vendors don’t need to follow the same rules.

          • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, then you won’t even be able to use in-app purchases.

            That’s not true - they wouldn’t be able to use the Google Play APIs for payments of course, but if the app is sideloaded they can definitely use any payment processor / method. If the app isn’t on the Play Store then Google has no say over it.

            Android supposedly has an option to side load, and even install another store, but in order to do it, you get through a series of warnings

            It’s really not as difficult as you make it seem.

            1. Send a link to the user somehow (SMS, email etc); or user goes to the website
            2. Click on the Download button
            3. Open the APK
            4. In the dialog box that pops up, click on the Settings button > then allow Samsung Internet
            5. Click on the Install button

            That’s it. There were no “series of warnings” to go thru, no need to flip between multiple screens or anything. I literally just went thru this process to install the Epic store my Galaxy Fold 4 - which took only a few seconds in total - and it was in no way complicated or “scary” at all. And bear in mind that the audience in this case are gamers - people who are already familiar with the concept of downloading and installing programs on a PC, so it’s not like you’re targeting some tech-illiterate people here.

            The only one that lasted is F-Droid

            Not true again. Aurora Droid and Droid-ify are both reasonably popular, at least in the OSS/enthusiast communities. Yes they use the F-Droid repos but they also subscribe to other repos (Guardian Project, Izzy etc), so you’re getting your apps from multiple sources.

            There are also proprietary stores such as Aptoide which are quite popular in the Asian markets. Finally, you’re completely ignoring other stores which are bundled out-of-the-box on many non-Google phones such as the Galaxy Store on Samsungs, Mi Store on Xiaomis, AppGallery on Huawei etc. Of course, in the western market the Play Store is the most dominant, but the Samsung store is reasonably popular among Samsung users (as they have regular deals on games and various other apps + some exclusives like Good Lock and other Samsung-specific apps), and of course, the OEM stores are also quite popular in Asian markets.

            • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not OP, and, correct me if I’m misremembering, but you did actually used to have to enable developer options to be able to sideload at all, and Android doesn’t tell you how to do that.

            • yamanii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You seem too certain that it’s still simple, but everytime I’m installing a new APK my Xiaomi makes me wait 10 seconds and puts a big, red, scary sign saying how dangerous it is to side load, then finally the ok buttons unlocks and I install my app.

            • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, then you won’t even be able to use in-app purchases.

              I didn’t realize that. Never actually tried to buy anything. You can’t even make purchases in the Samsung store? Or Huawei?

              OP is mistaken - you can make purchases in side-loaded apps, only thing is that app can’t use the Google Play APIs for that (obviously) - but they’re free to use PayPal or stripe or w/e payment method. Google has no way of preventing sideloaded apps from doing that, and it’s not like they can ban them either.

              You are put through a series of warnings just like you are when downloading an executable in the browser, or installing it on Windows.

              Actually, there isn’t even any actual “warning” - at least not on my Fold 4 - there was just one dialog to enable installation from unknown sources, with a “Settings” button that takes you directly to the page where you need to tick the box next to your browser, and as soon as you tick the box, you can click on the “Install” button to install it. That’s it. None of the dialogs you interact with has any actual warnings.

                • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I believe that is the crux of it. And apparently part of the trial exposed that some big players have special deals such that don’t have to pay those in-app purchase commissions, or at least have a smaller commission. And that’s what makes it an abuse of their market position.

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But Epic v. Google turned out to be a very different case. It hinged on secret revenue sharing deals between Google, smartphone makers, and big game developers, ones that Google execs internally believed were designed to keep rival app stores down. It showed that Google was running scared of Epic specifically. And it was all decided by a jury, unlike the Apple ruling.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They obviously aren’t forcing everyone to use Google billing, but it seems like an antitrust case gains a lot more ground if the accused pays money to quite a bit of people to prevent them from using competitors. That’s what’s getting Google here, apparently, not real forcing.

    • bigFab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      On top of what Aatube says about secret unfair deals, Google’s Play Store is necessary to run essential social services. In my case I need it to download my banking app and to sign into my university’s online studies.

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even something as simple as the Wikipedia app checks to see if Google Play Services is installed and running before it’ll let you use it.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Need an app to configure good ol’ eduroam wifi too

            I’m pretty sure you don’t, or at least didn’t, it’s just much more of a hassle to configure

            • Johanno@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              In theory you don’t. In practice I couldn’t get working with the 6 page step for step tutorial.

              It is almost impossible to get it working without the app.

      • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that won’t necessarily change with this ruling right? Your government doesn’t need to change how their apps function because of this.

        • bigFab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really hope you’r wrong on that. Anyways, it’s a pleasure to see Google bleeding.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Galaxy Store was a special exception made for Samsung. Generally, Google is pretty “persuasive” about being the only pre-installed app store on the phone.

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s in the contract between Google and Samsung? What exactly are the conditions for including both stores? Can any phone manufacturer get the same deal? What are the requirements for licensing Android? What number of phones on the market don’t include Play Store by default? What % of applications are only in Play Store?

          Monopoly is not about exceptions but about market control. Until you know what companies have to do to use Android and function on the market you can’t really tell if it’s monopoly or not.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have to imagine the contract that Samsung has is “We’re Samsung. We basically ARE Korean technology. We can build our own mobile OS if we want to and cut you out entirely. That’s a lot of spying on customers you wouldn’t get to do. We get our own app store or we walk. Oh look, LG just exited the smart phone market. Do what must be done.”

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does the Amazon store, Galaxy Store, AppGallery, Mi GetApps, and AOPPO app market not exist?

        • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Are those all on the phone by default?

          Edit: I didn’t ask if some of them are installed by default, I asked if ALL of them are installed by default.

          • icedterminal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t speak for the others, but the Samsung Galaxy Store does come pre-installed. However, Google paid Samsung for the Play Store to be the default action for app installs. So you get both stores and can pick which one you want.

            • Rose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s just two options from two big players who cooperate, and only on some devices.

            • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Samsung galaxy store comes pre-installed on Samsung phones, I haven’t heard of it being pre-installed on non-samsung phones.

            • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So what you’re saying is that two of them are installed by default on some phones, but not all of them? Because the comment they replied to was talking about app stores being installed by default, so I’m asking if all those app stores are all installed by default. Because it seems like only some of them sometimes get installed by default on some phones.

              • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know what’s on every phone. But I can confirm those 2 are defaults on some devices through personal experience.

                And there are also devices without the Play store by default. Amazon products are probably the best example, but they’re not the only ones.

                Don’t get me wrong - Google does some terrible shit. But they’re better than pretty much every other major software company on this issue. All the major game consoles and Apple require the use of their stores exclusively. Microsoft requires the Microsoft store to be installed on any modern Windows machine.

                Yeah - the Play Store is the de-facto default and by far the most successful on the platform. And yeah - Google likes it that way and encourages it. But so does everyone else. The difference is that Google is the best actor in this area.

                Google allows sideloading. They allow other storefronts. They allow other stores to be installed by default by manufacturers. They allow manufacturers to not include the Play Store. And they allow the removal/disabling of the Play Store by users.

            • Rose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The jury settled on the relevant geographic market being “worldwide excluding China”.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Impairment means something is there, it’s being used, it just isn’t as good. Prevented means you shut it down.”

      Epic’s expert Bernheim argues that Google’s expert Gentzkow “ignores four critical aspects of Google’s conduct,” including:

      1. Google impairs competition without preventing it entirely

      2. Google’s conduct targets comeptition as it emerges

      3. Google is dominant

      4. Google shares its Play profits with its competitors

      “When push came to shove, he talked about whether competition is prevented” rather than impaired, says Bernheim.

      The upshot of that: Bernheim believes Epic doesn’t need to prove Google actually blocked competition entirely. In his opinion (for Epic), Epic only needs to show there were no good alternatives to Google Play and Google Play Billing. It doesn’t need to show there were no alternatives at all.

      For example, says Bernheim, Gentzkow presented a chart titled “Was Fortnite Blocked?” showing that revenue tanked on Google Play after the app was kicked off the store, but didn’t tank for Android phones that got Fortnite a different way.

      But “If off-Google Play was a good substitute for Google Play, you’d see when one drops, the other goes up commensurably.” That didn’t happen: demand stayed stable outside of Play, according to the bar graph we just saw. “There’s no indication that any of the people here are substituting to off-Google Play.”

    • OscarRobin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google effectively has a monopoly on the Android app ecosystem and this trial brought to light mountains of evidence that they maintain this through extremely anti-competitive means.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      None of those are allowed on the Play Store. And when you try to side load an app, it warns you about it being dangerous.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Play Store doesn’t allow other app stores.
          “4.5 You may not use Google Play to distribute or make available any Product that has a purpose that facilitates the distribution of software applications and games for use on Android devices outside of Google Play.” - Google Play Developer Distribution Agreement

          Computers have had warnings about installing software since the beginning of computers

          I think “Computers” go back way farther than you’re imagining. There was a time when you didn’t even install software on computers. You just put in a disk and ran what was on it. We don’t even need to go back to when “Computer” was an actual job title. Something that humans (mostly women) did.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              …huh? Why would there be an app store inside an app store?

              To make it easy to access other app stores of course. You can use one web browser to download another can’t you.

              No I was just speaking simply. You know what I meant.

              Maybe too simply, because I really don’t. Windows didn’t give any warnings about installing any programs until Windows 10 I think. And even then it’s only the truly esoteric and unknown to Microsoft.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    ITT: lots of people wondering why Apple won and Google lost, but not reading the article, which explains the difference of the cases.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, fuck that. I definitely don’t agree with the ruling. iOS is far more restrictive than Android, because at least Android provides the ability to easily install alternatives (F-droid app store is an awesome alternative for many types of apps and it’s all free). Sure, Android dominates the market globally, but in the US–nd many other countries-- Apple has the majority of marketshare. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ios-vs-android-market-share-135251641.html

        It’s just bullshit to me that Apple gets a free pass for clearly being anti-competitive. I’m glad this trial struck down Google’s app store monopoly, but all phone OS’s should be forbidden from doing it.

        • bigFab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Totally agree with your idea, but so you know Apple has lost another legal fight. Europe condemnes it for monopoly of not only App Store, but also Safari and other services. About a month ago.

          • yamanii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The browser monopoly really is a stupid thing, what even is the point of installing any other browser if they have to be reskins of safari?

      • inverted_deflector@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah and honestly Im fine with courts opening up the platforms more to make at ths point, but the issue is that apple got the win. People cite incentives and back doors dealings on googles end, but apple doesnt need to they just control everything by default no questions asked.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No it doesn’t, it just says that the case was different and that it wasn’t in front of a jury, it doesn’t give the details of the difference. You have to go read the entire article from a few years ago

  • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    About the only benefit I can personally see from this is the ability to fully integrate F-Droid as an app store in my device, with proper automatic background updates, and without requiring root solutions that void my work’s security measures for mobile devices. On the other hand, I can see Huawei, Amazon, and Epic jumping to the fray with their own app stores and system services, and maybe Google Play being far more lenient with subscription services like Spotify’s in their own App Store. Altogether, I personally loathe Epic’s approach, but appreciate the consequences of their lawsuit.

    • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Increased competition is ALWAYS better for the customer.

      You’re forgetting AppBrain from like 15 years ago.

      I agree on the concerns, but it’s a virtually universal truth, so long as they’re actually forced to treat other app stores fairly. We might end up with a true third party stepping in to claim the throne, at least until the mega-corps reverse all the optimization they’ve created for their own benefits (even things like searches for apps are not fully intended to benefit the user right now, things most people don’t really realize).

    • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Amazon has/had an app store, it was terrible. Though I welcome competitors to step up after this.

      • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Amazon still has its own app store open - mostly because it’s the one Microsoft used as the base for their Android compatibility layer. I expect this ruling to give Amazon a breath of fresh air as “the alternative app store”.

    • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Droidify with adb or Shizuku can already do that. But it needs Android 12+. Then it can do unattended updates.

      • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Problem is, ADB requires enabling developer mode, and guess what - my company also blocks access to devices with developer mode on! (Also, the fact that Shizuku doesn’t work correctly over mobile because it requires stable Wi-Fi to fake a wireless debug connection doesn’t help matters.)

        • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Shizuku only requires WiFi once per boot. But it also needs ADB, so it sadly won’t work for your company phone.
          I think the Session Installer mode allows updates without a dialog for apps already installed by Droidify without dev mode or adb.

  • candle_lighter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So odd that the open source platform that allows sideloading and doesn’t even come with an app store by default is the one that is a monopoly but the locked down one with total control over your device is not.

    Some Android flavors even come with other app stores. Samsung phones have their own Samsung app store that even includes Fortnite.

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Welcome to law, Apple is less monopolistic than Google legally simply because Apple built a better monopoly, by denying competition in the first place.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do control Play Services, however. That’s not open source and includes proprietary apps basically essential for an operating smart phone such as Google sign in, Maps, and of course the Play Store. Google used their market dominance in those fields to prevent third parties from launching or installing competitors to the Play Store by denying Play Services to those who didn’t comply; paying them off directly or brokering sweetheart deals. That’s appears like an obvious abuse of their market position.

      • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They do control Play Services, however. That’s not open source and includes proprietary apps basically essential for an operating smart phone such as Google sign in, Maps, and of course the Play Store.

        Wtf is this? You do not need google sign in for running a smart phone. Hell, one of the features of stock AOSP Android is being in no way tied to Google.

        • shirro@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not just the degoogled open source Android disros either. Amazon has a commercial fork of Android with its own app store. There was Oppo’s AOSP derived ColorOS which was not based on Google’s stock Android. I don’t think Google should control the core apps as tightly as they do on stock Android but on the other hand those apps sort of define stock android and the default user experience in the marketplace. Epic could roll their own fork if they wanted and substitute apps.

          On the subject of Oppo, I think Tencent went after them and other Chinese manufacturers as well to get into their platforms. Tencent are the guys who push their own app store and one app to rule them that Musk has wet dreams about. I sometimes wonder if they are using Epic to wedge open US based app stores for a future WeChat/MyApp like approach. Not that the US government would allow that.

          Valve created their own console and helped fund Wine development, presumably as a strategic move to counter Microsoft’s platform control. I might be missing something but I don’t see similar effort or innovation from Epic.

          I believe Microsoft and Nvidia did deals with hardware manufacturers for years that helped exclude competition and those sorts of deals probably pose more difficulty in court. Google might have fallen into a trap and done something similar. Being vertically integrated Apple doesn’t have to do deals with other manufacturers but presumably they have some deals with developers. Obviously Sony, Nintendo have exclusives, agreements with developers and tight control of their platforms as well that go far beyond anything I can see with Google so I do find it a bit confusing.

  • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is so wild. Google allows side loading and 3rd party app stores…and that is the reason they were found guilty.

    Unlike Apple, Google allows people to download apps onto phones running its Android operating system without going through its official app store, but the company strikes deals with phone manufacturers to favor Google’s official app store.

    So because they strike deals to favor their store, even though they allow 3rd party stores to begin with, they’ve violated the SAA.

    Meanwhile, Apple who refuses to allow competition or 3rd party app stores is sitting pretty because…well, they haven’t “favored” their own store over rival stores. BECAUSE RIVAL STORES CANT EXIST. I don’t know how you could favor your store any harder than that??

    The legal shenanigans around all of this are frustrating to watch as a lay person.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Finally a big W. Google backdoored Android with Google Play Services and gives itself special permissions that no other app can do. They should be under the same limitations that other apps are reserved to. That’s why projects like Sandboxed Google play is really awesome.

  • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure this has nothing to do with the EU lawsuits, right?

    Both Google and Apple would still have to open up soon (at least in EU)

    Sorry if it’s a stupid question.

    • Tibert@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s something else. Here it’s US antitrust monopoly.

      Google made deals with games and special contracts with other apps in order to kill competition.

  • inverted_deflector@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I understand the concern over the single appstore monopoly that we have on any device, I think it’s worth remembering what ecosystem android and IOS came into.

    The old multimedia phones that were sold in the mid 00s were effectively “smart”. Many of them ran java and you could install programs, and freely install ringtones, and browsers that actually worked like opera mini/mobile. The thing is you couldnt by default. At least not in the US. The devices were locked down and everything you did went through the carrier’s store. And US telecom services are some of the greediest and scummiest companies out there so you couldnt even use your own mp3 files as a ringtone.

    Apple combated this with their closed off ecosystem, but android did face issues with fragmentation in the early days and needed a way to prevent the telecoms branded phones from stinking up the ecosystem. They did this by leveraging the play services and play store. From the playstore they can also since mainline release various peacemeal updates which helps resolve their other issue with fragmentation and thats android device being abandoned.

    Sure enough you can still release your own version of android without it, amazon’s tablets and tv sticks do pretty well.

    That said I do think it’s a good to help people move past the default and open up the platforms more, I just wish it would apply to all smart devices,

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. I was part of Verizon’s app development program and it was a fucking joke. Even if the dev tools and build chain wasn’t a complete mess, and even if the dev license wasn’t expensive, and even if it wasn’t almost impossible to even get test hardware… Even if you managed to build something more useful than snake, you’d still have to wait months and months and months for Verizon to sign your apps and then months more before they’d be available on any handset. I’m legitimately not sure it was even possible for a small dev to get anything approved.

      Open app stores were and still are amazing. I get that people want even more freedom, but coming from the trauma of feature phone development, I find it hard to get upset about this, especially considering Android makes it dead simple to sideload.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks, ChatGPT.

          I don’t think so

          Sure smells like it.

          Nobody was asking for a history lesson of the past that doesn’t draw any real conclusion to the current situation, at the end of the comment.

        • unexpectedteapot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely worth the downvotes. It is a paragraph worth of nothing. Literally nothing of value or relevance added to the thread.

            • StuffYouFear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I thought it was a good read and reminded me of the garbage I did at one time live through involving non-iphones

              Sorry people are being mean on the internet, they may not be aware they dont have to consume all information that is posted in front of them.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well thats just mean for no particular reason.

              Your comment was a nonsensical history lesson, and didn’t serve the current conversation of the topic being discussed.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah, call them as you see them. No need to F around when it comes to people polluting the Internet.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely worth the downvotes. It is a paragraph worth of nothing. Literally nothing of value or relevance added to the thread.

            Agree. Smells like a ChatGPT flavored comment.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So now Google will be forced to… allow third party app stores? Like F-Droid or Amazon and I think Yandex has a big one as well. If Epic aren’t suing for damages I don’t really see what the goal could be. Another win for all the lawyers I guess.

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine Epic doesn’t really care about that so much as not giving Google 30% of in-game purchases in Fortnite.

        • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe, but that’s not where the vast majority of people look for apks and part of the lawsuit where Epic says they have a monopoly.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And ask normal people to give their browser app-install permissions?

          Those sound very scary, not a very practical way to get a lot of users

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google isn’t being forced to do anything. The judge specifically stated they’re not doing injunctions or anything. If Epic has another problem, “you can come back.”

      Now, that’s still a ruling, and a ruling helps dissuade Google from doing certain things, but there’s not likely to be anything “forced” here.

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Currently, it’s.more that Google isn’t being forced to do anything yet. The judge has said a few things he won’t do, but the final judgement on what Google has to do are “up to Judge James Donato, who’ll decide what the appropriate remedies might be.”

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Epic aren’t suing for damages I don’t really see what the goal could be

      As reported by The Verge,

      Epic says it’s asking for three things: freedom for Epic and other developers to introduce their own stores without restriction, total freedom to use its own billing system, and an anti-circumvention provision “just to be sure Google can’t reintroduce the same problems through some alternative creative solution.”

      Judge Donato says the last won’t happen: “We don’t do don’t- break-the-law injunctions… if you have a problem, you can come back.”

  • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I run e/OS, I don’t have google app store or any of the related service software installed. Yet I am able to use a cleaned up version of android and still have access to the google app store through an anonymous account using the in built app.

    Epic won this case against google…

    Epic lost the same case against apple, with which none of the above would be possible.

    I’m not advocating for google, obviously I avoid them. But that’s BS, I hope this is used as precedent to bring a new case against apple.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously this is crazy. Apple somehow winning is way worse as there is simply no way to install third party apps on IOS. Android makes the risks clear but it’s still at least possible if you click install anyway.

      In terms of being a monopoly, in the US ios has more market share anyway. Google’s lawyers must have really made some big mistake.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No the point. Most users won’t install anything not on the app store.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, but how is that a monopoly? There is even a fullon android AppStore from Amazon

        • shrugal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          A monopoly is about market share and access to a market, “there is also …” doesn’t cut it in that discussion.

            • The Uncanny Observer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Apple apparently doesn’t do backroom deals to stop other people from making app stores. That’s the difference between the two verdicts.

              Of course, that’s because Apple just doesn’t allow other app stores at all, but apparently that’s not against the rules.

              • poopkins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They do backroom deals to bring apps and games to iOS by offering reduced commissions on app purchases and subscriptions. They just haven’t been caught yet.

            • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Apple’s app store may be a problem, but saying “someone else is also doing something bad” doesn’t mean what Google is doing isn’t bad & illegal.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t like the notion that something having majority market share makes it a monopoly. The definition of monopoly, at least, as understood by me implies control of supply, not just having a higher demand.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do infact. The exact filename is FortniteInstaller-5.3.0.apk, so you’re not too off the mark. :)

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    My interpretation of the article is that it wasn’t Google’s app store but the deals Google did with other manufacturers and big studios that caused them problems. Unlike iOS Android has both open source and commercial forks. Amazon have their own app store for their own range of devices and you can load that app store on regular Android I believe if you want to access a shittier range of apps. There are degoogled versions of Android and many people including myself run f-droid or side load apks. It is much more open than Apple’s system which won.