• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they’re making $150-300k per year, with more for severance. That is indeed relatively low compared to major tech companies.

    The article’s examples were Docusign (CEO made $85M) and Google (CEO made $225M).

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hell, even low 7-figures could make sense. Though even that’s still high.

        But Jesus Christ with these hundreds of millions, it’s obscene.

    • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s important to note that most of what they “made” is actually just the stock that they already own or the stock options they received.

      In general the actual cash that they receive is less than $500k.

      Taxes are calculated differently on stock sales vs wages.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right that their salaries weren’t $500k plus, those numbers included severance. Actual salaries were in the order of $150-300k (with the highest salaries paid to the owners).

        Wikimedia doesn’t have stock AFAIK.