• PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    As I see it, the real question is what role we think mechanical skill plays in creation of art.

    From what i noticed, art critics generally disdain realism in painting often going as far as “what is the point of painting photo since you can just make a photo” so i guess they shouldn’t complain about AI being used as tool, but i feel they will do it anyway.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Yeah i read something along those lines, invention of photography and especially simplifying the equipment can potentially make everyone a realist painter (still the differences in skill are noticeable as every fan of photography would tell you), so i just see AI as next stage of making potentially anyone into artist. I always thought the technical skills are the biggest obstacle, as i have pretty vivid imagination but next to no skill to express it.

        *Fuck the critics though, my favourite painters are still Ilya Repin, Jan Matejko and Jacques-Louis David.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah completely agree with that. The whole gatekeeping around what constitutes “real art” is pure nonsense in my opinion. Any tool that helps people express themselves is a net positive. And I’ve personally been having a ton of fun playing with stable diffusion. I find it’s particularly good at doing abstract style, and in a lot of cases it really does look like it could’ve been painted by somebody. A few nice results I got recently: